Brzózka Krzysztof, Finke Stefan, Conzelmann Karl-Klaus
Max-von-Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
J Virol. 2005 Jun;79(12):7673-81. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7673-7681.2005.
Rabies virus (RV) of the Rhabdoviridae family grows in alpha/beta interferon (IFN)-competent cells, suggesting the existence of viral mechanisms preventing IFN gene expression. We here identify the viral phosphoprotein P as the responsible IFN antagonist. The critical involvement of P was first suggested by the observation that an RV expressing an enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-P fusion protein (SAD eGFP-P) (S. Finke, K. Brzozka, and K. K. Conzelmann, J. Virol. 78:12333-12343, 2004) was eliminated in IFN-competent HEp-2 cell cultures, in contrast to wild-type (wt) RV or an RV replicon lacking the genes for matrix protein and glycoprotein. SAD eGFP-P induced transcription of the IFN-beta gene and expression of the IFN-responsive MxA and STAT-1 genes. Similarly, an RV expressing low levels of P, which was generated by moving the P gene to a promoter-distal gene position (SAD DeltaPLP), lost the ability to prevent IFN induction. The analysis of RV mutants lacking expression of truncated P proteins P2, P3, or P4, which are expressed from internal AUG codons of the wt RV P open reading frame, further showed that full-length P is competent in suppressing IFN-beta gene expression. In contrast to wt RV, the IFN-inducing SAD DeltaPLP caused S386 phosphorylation, dimerization, and transcriptional activity of IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3). Phosphorylation of IRF-3 by TANK-binding kinase-1 expressed from transfected plasmids was abolished in wt RV-infected cells or by cotransfection of P-encoding plasmids. Thus, RV P is necessary and sufficient to prevent a critical IFN response in virus-infected cells by targeting activation of IRF-3 by an upstream kinase.
弹状病毒科的狂犬病病毒(RV)在具有α/β干扰素(IFN)活性的细胞中生长,这表明存在阻止IFN基因表达的病毒机制。我们在此确定病毒磷蛋白P是负责的IFN拮抗剂。P的关键作用首先是通过观察到表达增强型绿色荧光蛋白(eGFP)-P融合蛋白的RV(SAD eGFP-P)(S. Finke、K. Brzozka和K. K. Conzelmann,《病毒学杂志》78:12333-12343,2004年)在具有IFN活性的HEp-2细胞培养物中被清除,这与野生型(wt)RV或缺乏基质蛋白和糖蛋白基因的RV复制子形成对比而提出的。SAD eGFP-P诱导IFN-β基因的转录以及IFN反应性MxA和STAT-1基因的表达。同样,通过将P基因移至启动子远端基因位置而产生的表达低水平P的RV(SAD DeltaPLP)失去了阻止IFN诱导的能力。对缺乏截短的P蛋白P2、P3或P4表达的RV突变体的分析进一步表明,全长P能够抑制IFN-β基因的表达。与wt RV不同,诱导IFN的SAD DeltaPLP导致IFN调节因子3(IRF-3)的S386磷酸化、二聚化和转录活性。在wt RV感染的细胞中或通过共转染编码P的质粒,由转染质粒表达的TANK结合激酶-1对IRF-3的磷酸化被消除。因此,RV P通过靶向上游激酶对IRF-3的激活来预防病毒感染细胞中的关键IFN反应,这是必要且充分的。