Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction: goal should be interhospital transfer for primary angioplasty.
作者信息
Ivanusa Mario
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7502.1271-a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction: goal should be interhospital transfer for primary angioplasty.降低心肌梗死死亡率：目标应为进行院间转运以实施直接冠状动脉介入治疗。
BMJ. 2005 May 28;330(7502):1271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7502.1271-a.
2
A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Oct 15;76(11):830-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80238-0.
3
The cost effectiveness of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis in the real world: one year results from West London.真实世界中直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗的成本效果比较：来自伦敦西部的一年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Nov;6(5):596-603. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I5A100.
4
The cost of an open infarct-related artery: comparison of treatment modalities in the reperfusion era.开通梗死相关动脉的代价：再灌注时代治疗方式的比较
Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 Jan;69(1):87-9. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61619-x.
5
Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1741-50. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00391-4.
6
A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗与直接冠状动脉血管成形术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 10;336(15):1103; author reply 1104. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704103361514.
7
[Cost-effectiveness of primary PTCA and thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction].[直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术（PTCA）与溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的成本效益分析]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000 Aug 19;130(33):1146-51.
8
A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗与直接冠状动脉血管成形术的比较。心肌梗死分诊与干预研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 24;335(17):1253-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610243351701.
9
Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study.对于在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心60分钟内的患者，与院前溶栓相比，直接血管成形术可使成本最小化：急性心肌梗死血管成形术与院前溶栓比较（CAPTIM）成本效益亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.031.
10
Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Ensuring early reperfusion, by whatever means, is the best strategy for now.急性心肌梗死中的再灌注。目前，无论采用何种方法确保早期再灌注都是最佳策略。
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1354-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1354.
引用本文的文献
1
Inter-hospital and intra-hospital patient transfer: Recent concepts.医院间和医院内患者转运：最新概念
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;60(7):451-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.186012.
2
When place and time matter: How to conduct safe inter-hospital transfer of patients.地点和时间至关重要时：如何安全地进行患者的院际转运
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):104-13. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125964.
本文引用的文献
1
Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction.降低心肌梗死死亡率
BMJ. 2005 Apr 16;330(7496):856-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7496.856.
2
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic treatment: long term follow up according to infarct location.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗：根据梗死部位进行的长期随访
Heart. 2006 Jan;92(1):75-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.060152. Epub 2005 Apr 14.
3
Hospitalization costs of primary stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: cost analysis of the Canadian STAT Study.急性心肌梗死中初次支架置入术与溶栓治疗的住院费用：加拿大STAT研究的成本分析
Circulation. 2003 Nov 25;108(21):2624-30. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097120.26062.FE. Epub 2003 Nov 3.
4
Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.与溶栓治疗相比，直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术对急性心肌梗死的长期益处。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1413-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411901.
Zotero 插件