Suppr超能文献

吸附性粒细胞/单核细胞单采术治疗难治性类风湿关节炎:一项开放性试点多中心试验

Adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis for the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open pilot multicentre trial.

作者信息

Sanmartí R, Marsal S, Valverde J, Casado E, Lafuente R, Kashiwagi N, Rodriguez-Cros J-R, Erra A, Reina D, Gratacós J

机构信息

Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Rheumatology, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Sep;44(9):1140-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh701. Epub 2005 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GCAP) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients with active and refractory RA were treated with weekly GCAP sessions using a column filled with acetate beads (Adacolumn) over five consecutive weeks. Clinical assessments and response to therapy were analysed at weeks 5, 7, 12 and 20 in an open multicentre trial. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 20. EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response criteria, based on the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) and disability using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 27 patients, 81.5% were women with mean disease duration of 14.4 yr. The mean number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was 3.7, and 48.1% of patients had previously failed on biologicals. On an intention-to-treat basis, 40.7% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 44.4% a therapeutic EULAR response at week 20. These percentages were 50 and 54.5% in 22 patients who completed the trial. In the 10 completers who had previously failed on biologicals, an ACR response was achieved in four patients (ACR20, two; ACR50, one; ACR70, one). A significant decrease was recorded in different ACR response components, including the tender joint and swollen joint counts, pain score and patient and physician global disease assessments, as well as the DAS28 index; most of them improved after week 5. ESR and CRP, but not the HAQ score, had decreased significantly at week 20. The treatment was well tolerated and only one serious adverse event related to the study procedure was documented (sepsis due to a catheter infection).

CONCLUSIONS

GCAP treatment led to significant clinical improvement in a subset of patients with RA who had failed to respond to DMARDs or biologicals. Further large, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to fully assess the therapeutic value of GCAP for refractory RA.

摘要

目的

评估吸附性粒细胞和单核细胞单采术(GCAP)治疗难治性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项开放的多中心试验中,活动性难治性RA患者连续五周每周接受一次使用填充醋酸盐珠的柱(Adacolumn)进行的GCAP治疗。在第5、7、12和20周分析临床评估和治疗反应。临床反应的主要结局指标是第20周时美国风湿病学会标准(ACR20)改善20%。还评估了基于28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)和使用健康评估问卷(HAQ)评估的残疾情况的欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)反应标准。

结果

27例患者中,81.5%为女性,平均病程14.4年。既往使用改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的平均数量为3.7种,48.1%的患者既往生物制剂治疗失败。在意向性治疗的基础上,40.7%的患者在第20周达到ACR20,44.4%达到EULAR治疗反应。在完成试验的22例患者中,这些百分比分别为50%和54.5%。在既往生物制剂治疗失败的10例完成者中,4例患者实现了ACR反应(ACR20,2例;ACR50,1例;ACR70,1例)。不同的ACR反应成分均有显著下降,包括压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、疼痛评分以及患者和医生的整体疾病评估,还有DAS28指数;其中大多数在第5周后有所改善。在第20周时,血沉(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)显著下降,但HAQ评分未下降。该治疗耐受性良好,仅记录到1例与研究操作相关的严重不良事件(导管感染导致的败血症)。

结论

GCAP治疗使一部分对DMARDs或生物制剂无反应的RA患者临床症状得到显著改善。有必要进行进一步的大规模、安慰剂对照研究,以全面评估GCAP对难治性RA的治疗价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验