• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后瘢痕与经阴道分娩的试验。

Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section.

作者信息

Hassan Aisha

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology. Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad.

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005 Jan-Mar;17(1):57-61.

PMID:15929530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The caesarean section rate has increased to an alarming extent in the last three decades the world over and fear of rupture of uterus in subsequent pregnancy and labour has led to a high rate of repeat caesarean sections. The objective of this study was to determine the final outcome of a trial of scar and Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (VBAC) and develop guidelines to reduce the rate of unnecessary repeat caesarean section.

METHODS

This study was carried out in Obstetric and Gynecology Unit 'A' of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from 01.11.2002 to 31.10.2004. A total of 2652 patients were delivered during this period out of which 297 patients had history of one previous caesarean section. A total of 53 patients had an elective repeat caesarean section and rest of 244 was subjected to a trial of scar.

RESULT

Out of 244 patients selected for trial of scar, 165 (67.2%) had a successful uncomplicated vaginal delivery, 7 (3.2%) were delivered by forceps, 11 (5.2%) with vacuum extractor and 61 (24.4%) required a repeat emergency caesarean section. 83% of the patients had a spontaneous onset of labour and 17% needed induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 pesseries and augmentation of the labour with oxytocin. However repeat caesarean section rate was high in the later group. 71.2% of the babies were born with Apgar score > 8 and 24.6% had an Apgar score between 6-8. There were 3 cases of scar dehiscence and one case of ruptured uterus and one baby was lost due to this complication. No serious maternal complication occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 75% of the patients with previous one caesarean section for non-recurrent cause can be successfully delivered vaginally. Antenatal booking and follow up, careful case selection for trial of scar and close observations during labour will achieve successful maternal and perinatal outcome. VBAC also saves any future caesarean sections, as currently previous two caesarean sections is an indication for elective caesarean section.

摘要

背景

在过去三十年里,全球剖宫产率已上升到令人担忧的程度,对后续妊娠和分娩时子宫破裂的恐惧导致了重复剖宫产的高比率。本研究的目的是确定剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫试产及阴道分娩(VBAC)的最终结果,并制定指南以降低不必要的重复剖宫产率。

方法

本研究于2002年11月1日至2004年10月31日在阿伯塔巴德阿尤布教学医院妇产科A区进行。在此期间共分娩2652例患者,其中297例有一次剖宫产史。共有53例患者进行了择期重复剖宫产,其余244例接受了瘢痕子宫试产。

结果

在244例接受瘢痕子宫试产的患者中,165例(67.2%)成功进行了无并发症的阴道分娩,7例(3.2%)通过产钳助产,11例(5.2%)使用真空吸引器助产,61例(24.4%)需要再次紧急剖宫产。83%的患者自然发动分娩,17%需要使用前列腺素E2栓引产并用缩宫素加强宫缩。然而,后一组的重复剖宫产率较高。71.2%的婴儿出生时阿氏评分>8分,24.6%的婴儿阿氏评分在6 - 8分之间。有3例瘢痕裂开,1例子宫破裂,1例婴儿因该并发症死亡。未发生严重的母体并发症。

结论

超过75%因非复发性原因曾行一次剖宫产的患者可以成功进行阴道分娩。产前登记和随访、仔细选择瘢痕子宫试产病例以及分娩期间密切观察将实现成功的母婴和围产期结局。VBAC还可避免未来的剖宫产,因为目前有两次剖宫产史是择期剖宫产的指征。

相似文献

1
Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section.剖宫产术后瘢痕与经阴道分娩的试验。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005 Jan-Mar;17(1):57-61.
2
Vaginal birth after one previous Caesarean section--evaluation of predictive factors.经一次剖宫产术后的阴道分娩——预测因素评估
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2001 Mar-Jun;30(1-2):61-6.
3
Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria.尼日利亚一家三级医疗机构中,经产妇曾行剖宫产术后经阴道分娩。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Nov;24(8):886-90. doi: 10.1080/01443610400018742.
4
An experience with trial of scar in 66 Ethiopian women.66名埃塞俄比亚女性的瘢痕试验经历。
East Afr Med J. 1994 Oct;71(10):676-8.
5
Delivery after a lower segment caesarean section.下段剖宫产术后分娩。
Singapore Med J. 1993 Feb;34(1):62-6.
6
Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section.既往低位横切口剖宫产术后的子宫破裂与分娩
BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):729-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00940.x.
7
Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.既往有剖宫产史的女性引产术后子宫破裂
BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x.
8
Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment Caesarean: a review of 1000 consecutive cases.有一次下段剖宫产史的足月孕妇的分娩及围产期结局:1000例连续病例回顾
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Feb;47(1):31-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00675.x.
9
Vaginal delivery after caesarean section: a propective study of 146 cases.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:146例前瞻性研究。
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2006 Aug;128(4):213-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836756.
10
Out Come Of Trial Of Scar In Patients With Previous Caesarean Section.既往剖宫产患者瘢痕试验的结果
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):587-590.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prognostic Study for the Development of Risk Prediction Model for the Success of Vaginal Birth Following a Cesarean Surgery at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部费莱格·希沃特综合专科医院剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功风险预测模型开发的预后研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Jan 20;16:55-68. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S395388. eCollection 2023.
2
Late registration for antenatal care by pregnant women with previous history of caesarean section.有剖宫产史的孕妇晚登记产前护理。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 May 26;13(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2776.
3
Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study.
验证阿迪斯阿贝巴大学教学医院剖宫产术后阴道分娩预测模型: 一项横断面研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Sep 18;2020:1540460. doi: 10.1155/2020/1540460. eCollection 2020.
4
Obstetric factors for unsuccessful trial of labor in second-order birth following previous cesarean.既往剖宫产术后经阴试产失败的产科因素。
Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):356-62. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.356.
5
[Outcome of cesarean deliveries on cicatricial uterus in a university hospital in Burkina Faso].[布基纳法索一家大学医院瘢痕子宫剖宫产的结局]
Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:95. Epub 2012 Aug 2.