Suppr超能文献

菖蒲叶绿体基因组分析及其系统发育意义。

Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications.

作者信息

Goremykin Vadim V, Holland Barbara, Hirsch-Ernst Karen I, Hellwig Frank H

机构信息

Institut für Spezielle Botanik, Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Sep;22(9):1813-22. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi173. Epub 2005 Jun 1.

Abstract

Determining the phylogenetic relationships among the major lines of angiosperms is a long-standing problem, yet the uncertainty as to the phylogenetic affinity of these lines persists. While a number of studies have suggested that the ANITA (Amborella-Nymphaeales-Illiciales-Trimeniales-Aristolochiales) grade is basal within angiosperms, studies of complete chloroplast genome sequences also suggested an alternative tree, wherein the line leading to the grasses branches first among the angiosperms. To improve taxon sampling in the existing chloroplast genome data, we sequenced the chloroplast genome of the monocot Acorus calamus. We generated a concatenated alignment (89,436 positions for 15 taxa), encompassing almost all sequences usable for phylogeny reconstruction within spermatophytes. The data still contain support for both the ANITA-basal and grasses-basal hypotheses. Using simulations we can show that were the ANITA-basal hypothesis true, parsimony (and distance-based methods with many models) would be expected to fail to recover it. The self-evident explanation for this failure appears to be a long-branch attraction (LBA) between the clade of grasses and the out-group. However, this LBA cannot explain the discrepancies observed between tree topology recovered using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the topologies recovered using the parsimony and distance-based methods when grasses are deleted. Furthermore, the fact that neither maximum parsimony nor distance methods consistently recover the ML tree, when according to the simulations they would be expected to, when the out-group (Pinus) is deleted, suggests that either the generating tree is not correct or the best symmetric model is misspecified (or both). We demonstrate that the tree recovered under ML is extremely sensitive to model specification and that the best symmetric model is misspecified. Hence, we remain agnostic regarding phylogenetic relationships among basal angiosperm lineages.

摘要

确定被子植物主要类群之间的系统发育关系是一个长期存在的问题,然而这些类群的系统发育亲缘关系仍存在不确定性。虽然许多研究表明ANITA(无油樟目-睡莲目-八角目-腺齿木目-马兜铃目)类群是被子植物的基部类群,但对完整叶绿体基因组序列的研究也提出了另一种树形,即导致禾本科的分支在被子植物中最先分化出来。为了改进现有叶绿体基因组数据中的分类群抽样,我们对单子叶菖蒲的叶绿体基因组进行了测序。我们生成了一个串联比对(15个分类群,共89436个位点),涵盖了几乎所有可用于种子植物系统发育重建的序列。这些数据仍然支持ANITA基部假说和禾本科基部假说。通过模拟我们可以表明,如果ANITA基部假说是正确的,简约法(以及许多模型的基于距离的方法)预计将无法恢复这一假说。这种失败的显而易见的解释似乎是禾本科类群与外类群之间的长枝吸引(LBA)。然而,这种长枝吸引无法解释在删除禾本科后,使用最大似然法(ML)恢复的树形拓扑与使用简约法和基于距离的方法恢复的树形拓扑之间观察到的差异。此外,当根据模拟预期删除外类群(松属)时,最大简约法和距离法都不能一致地恢复ML树,这表明要么生成树不正确,要么最佳对称模型指定错误(或两者都错)。我们证明,在ML下恢复的树对模型指定极其敏感,并且最佳对称模型指定错误。因此,我们对基部被子植物谱系之间的系统发育关系仍持不可知论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验