Namer Barbara, Seifert Frank, Handwerker Hermann Otto, Maihöfner Christian
Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 17, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Neuroreport. 2005 Jun 21;16(9):955-9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200506210-00015.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychophysical effects of both TRPA1 and TRPM8 activation in humans by application of either cinnamaldehyde or menthol. We applied 10% cinnamaldehyde or 40% menthol solutions on the forearm in 10 study participants. Quantitative sensory testing and laser Doppler imaging was performed before and after exposure to the compounds. Cinnamaldehyde evoked significant spontaneous pain and induced heat and mechanical hyperalgesia, cold hypoalgesia and a neurogenic axon reflex erythema. In contrast, TRPM8 activation by menthol produced no axon reflex reaction and resulted in cold hyperalgesia. We conclude that agonists of TRPA1 and TRPM8 channels produce strikingly different psychophysical patterns.
本研究的目的是通过应用肉桂醛或薄荷醇来评估TRPA1和TRPM8激活对人体的心理物理效应。我们将10%的肉桂醛溶液或40%的薄荷醇溶液涂抹在10名研究参与者的前臂上。在接触这些化合物之前和之后进行了定量感觉测试和激光多普勒成像。肉桂醛引起了明显的自发疼痛,并诱发了热和机械性痛觉过敏、冷觉减退以及神经源性轴突反射性红斑。相比之下,薄荷醇激活TRPM8未产生轴突反射反应,并导致冷觉过敏。我们得出结论,TRPA1和TRPM8通道的激动剂产生了截然不同的心理物理模式。