Asturias Juan A, Ibarrola Ignacio, Ferrer Angel, Andreu Carmen, López-Pascual Esperanza, Quiralte Joaquín, Florido Fernando, Martínez Alberto
Research and Development Department, Bial-Aristegui, Alameda Urquijo 27, 48008-Bilbao, Spain.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Jun;115(6):1210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.02.012.
Diagnosis of Alternaria alternata sensitization is hampered by the variability and complexity of fungal extracts, and thus simplification of the diagnostic procedures with purified allergens should be pursued.
We sought to compare A alternata extract and purified natural Alt a 1 (nAlt a 1) and recombinant Alt a 1 (rAlt a 1) allergens for their diagnostic value.
Forty-two patients allergic to A alternata , 10 atopic patients with negative skin prick test responses to A alternata extract, and 10 healthy subjects were investigated. Skin prick tests and determination of specific IgE levels were performed with nAlt a 1 and 2 different types of rAlt a 1: rbAlt a 1, expressed in Escherichia coli , and ryAlt a 1, expressed in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica .
Prevalence for Alt a 1, Alt a 2, and Alt a 11 by IgE dot-blot testing was 98%, 0%, and 15%, respectively, and therefore Alt a 1 was used as a marker for A alternata sensitization. Immunoblotting and inhibition analysis showed no IgE-binding differences between nAlt a 1 and rAlt a 1. The whole group of patients with allergy to A alternata had positive skin test reactions to purified allergens at 100 microg/mL, whereas no false-positive reactions were detected. Natural or ryAlt a 1 elicited a similar response in skin tests compared with A alternata extract, although a reduced reactivity was observed with rbAlt a 1. Specific IgE levels to nAlt a 1 or rAlt a 1 showed significant correlation and similar sensitivity and specificity.
Alt a 1, either in its natural or recombinant form, is sufficient for a reliable diagnosis of A alternata sensitization and induces skin prick reactivity comparable with that produced by A alternata extract.
真菌提取物的变异性和复杂性阻碍了链格孢致敏的诊断,因此应寻求用纯化变应原简化诊断程序。
我们试图比较链格孢提取物与纯化的天然Alt a 1(nAlt a 1)和重组Alt a 1(rAlt a 1)变应原的诊断价值。
对42例对链格孢过敏的患者、10例对链格孢提取物皮肤点刺试验反应阴性的特应性患者和10名健康受试者进行了研究。用nAlt a 1和2种不同类型的rAlt a 1(在大肠杆菌中表达的rbAlt a 1和在解脂耶氏酵母中表达的ryAlt a 1)进行皮肤点刺试验并测定特异性IgE水平。
通过IgE斑点印迹试验,Alt a 1、Alt a 2和Alt a 11的阳性率分别为98%、0%和15%,因此Alt a 1被用作链格孢致敏的标志物。免疫印迹和抑制分析显示nAlt a 1和rAlt a 1之间在IgE结合方面无差异。整个对链格孢过敏的患者组对100μg/mL纯化变应原的皮肤试验反应均为阳性,而未检测到假阳性反应。与链格孢提取物相比,天然或ryAlt a 1在皮肤试验中引发的反应相似,尽管观察到rbAlt a 1的反应性有所降低。对nAlt a 1或rAlt a 1的特异性IgE水平显示出显著相关性以及相似的敏感性和特异性。
天然或重组形式的Alt a 1足以可靠诊断链格孢致敏,并诱导与链格孢提取物产生的皮肤点刺反应性相当的反应。