Bannowsky A, Wefer B, Naumann M, Hamann M, Hautmann S, Jünemann K-P
Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel.
Urologe A. 2005 Aug;44(8):915-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-005-0839-z.
Moderate activity of systemic chemotherapy for advanced urothelial cancer has been reported for more than 30 years. Only with the advent of potent combination therapy in the mid-1980s have clinically significant response rates and prolonged survival been documented. Due to the small number of cases and poor prognosis, knowledge is scant about the therapeutic effect of "second-line" polychemotherapy in metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer. We report an interesting case of a 59-year-old man suffering from urothelial cancer of the renal pelvis with pulmonary, lymphogenous, and bone metastases who had an unexpected response to "second-line" chemotherapy with only 2 treatment cycles of gemcitabine/paclitaxel (partial remission) after 24 treatment cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin in "stable disease" with progression between the therapeutic intervals.
30多年来一直有关于晚期尿路上皮癌全身化疗适度活性的报道。直到20世纪80年代中期强效联合疗法出现后,才有了具有临床意义的缓解率和延长生存期的记录。由于病例数量少且预后差,关于转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌“二线”多药化疗的治疗效果的了解很少。我们报告了一例有趣的病例,一名59岁男性患有肾盂尿路上皮癌并伴有肺、淋巴和骨转移,在吉西他滨/顺铂治疗24个周期后处于“疾病稳定”且治疗间隔期病情进展,接受仅2个周期的吉西他滨/紫杉醇“二线”化疗后出现意外反应(部分缓解)。