Kendler Howard H
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Am Psychol. 2005 May-Jun;60(4):318-24. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.318.
Controversies are rampant in contemporary psychology concerning the appropriate method for observing consciousness and the role inner experience should play in psychological theorizing. These conflicting orientations reflect, in part, methodological differences between natural science and human science interpretations of psychology. Humanistic psychology and philosophical phenomenology both employ a human science approach to psychology that seeks to explain behavior in terms of a person's subjective existence. Maslow's and Heidegger's formulations are both fulfillment theories in that they specify moral values that suggest how life ought to be lived. Natural science methodology rejects the possibility that moral imperatives can be validated, whereas human science methodology allows phenomenological convictions to justify recommendations about a fulfilled life and a good society. The social role of psychology is analyzed within the framework of phenomenological convictions and scientific truth.
在当代心理学中,关于观察意识的恰当方法以及内在体验在心理学理论构建中应发挥的作用,争议盛行。这些相互冲突的取向部分反映了自然科学和人文科学对心理学解释的方法论差异。人本主义心理学和哲学现象学都采用人文科学方法来研究心理学,试图从人的主观存在角度解释行为。马斯洛和海德格尔的理论都是关于自我实现的理论,因为它们明确了道德价值观,这些价值观表明了应该如何生活。自然科学方法论否认道德命令可以被证实的可能性,而人文科学方法论则允许现象学信念为关于充实生活和美好社会的建议提供正当理由。心理学的社会角色在现象学信念和科学真理的框架内进行分析。