Suppr超能文献

纤维蛋白胶与缝合支撑垫:100例腹腔镜部分肾切除术的经验教训

Fibrin glue v sutured bolster: lessons learned during 100 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies.

作者信息

Johnston William K, Montgomery Jeffrey S, Seifman Brian D, Hollenbeck Brent K, Wolf J Stuart

机构信息

Michigan Urology Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162041.64143.08.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is performed with marked technical variations. We defined the limits of sutureless LPN and determined which closure technique is best in a particular situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 100 consecutive LPNs fibrin glue products were used for closure in the first 75 (group 1) and sutured bolsters were applied when the collecting system (CS) or renal sinus was entered in the final 25 (group 2).

RESULTS

In groups 1 and 2 hand assisted laparoscopy was used in 72% vs 40% of cases and hilar clamping was used in 27% vs 92%, respectively. Mean tumor size was 25 vs 26 mm, tumor depth was 11 vs 13 mm, distance to the renal sinus was 9 vs 5 mm, operating room time was 185 vs 210 minutes, estimated blood loss was 398 vs 247 cc and hospital stay was 2.9 vs 2.6 days in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Overall postoperative hemorrhage and urine leakage occurred in 9% and 2% of patients, respectively. Tumors associated with postoperative hemorrhage/leakage tended to be larger (35 vs 24 mm, p = 0.007) and closer to the renal sinus (0.5 vs 8.2 mm, p = 0.02). Postoperative hemorrhage or urine leakage occurred in 41% of the 17 patients in group 1 with CS or renal sinus entry but in only 2 of the 58 (3.4%) without entry (p <0.0001). In group 2 hemorrhage/leakage occurred in 11% of the 18 patients with CS or renal sinus entry (vs same subset in group 1, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

LPN with closure using fibrin glue products provides adequate hemostasis when the CS or renal sinus is not entered. When the CS or renal sinus is entered, a sutured bolster is recommended.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)的技术存在显著差异。我们确定了无缝合LPN的限度,并确定在特定情况下哪种闭合技术最佳。

材料与方法

在连续100例LPN手术中,前75例(第1组)使用纤维蛋白胶产品进行闭合,最后25例(第2组)在进入集合系统(CS)或肾窦时应用缝合支撑物。

结果

第1组和第2组分别有72%和40%的病例采用手辅助腹腔镜检查,分别有27%和92%的病例采用肾门阻断。第1组和第2组的平均肿瘤大小分别为25mm和26mm,肿瘤深度分别为11mm和13mm,距肾窦的距离分别为9mm和5mm,手术时间分别为185分钟和210分钟,估计失血量分别为398cc和247cc,住院时间分别为2.9天和2.6天。总体术后出血和尿漏分别发生在9%和2%的患者中。与术后出血/漏出相关的肿瘤往往更大(35mm对24mm,p = 0.007)且更靠近肾窦(0.5mm对8.2mm,p = 0.02)。第1组中17例进入CS或肾窦的患者中有41%发生术后出血或尿漏,但在58例未进入的患者中仅有2例(3.4%)发生(p <0.0001)。第2组中18例进入CS或肾窦的患者中有11%发生出血/漏出(与第1组同一亚组相比,p = 0.04)。

结论

当未进入CS或肾窦时,使用纤维蛋白胶产品进行闭合的LPN可提供充分的止血效果。当进入CS或肾窦时,建议使用缝合支撑物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验