Suppr超能文献

土地利用对土壤有机碳化学以及农药和代谢物吸附的影响。

The effect of landuse on soil organic carbon chemistry and sorption of pesticides and metabolites.

作者信息

Oliver D P, Baldock J A, Kookana R S, Grocke S

机构信息

CSIRO Land and Water, PMB No. 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2005 Jul;60(4):531-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.027. Epub 2005 Feb 23.

Abstract

Earlier studies had shown significant differences in sorption of nine pesticides in soils collected from two landuses (native vegetation and market gardens), which could not be explained on the basis of organic carbon content alone. Consequently it was hypothesised that the differences in sorption behaviour between the two landuses may be due to variation in the chemistry of the organic carbon. In this study the relationship between sorption behaviour of the nine chemicals and soil organic carbon chemistry, as determined by solid-state (13)C NMR spectroscopy, was investigated. No significant differences were found between the two landuses in the distribution of the four main spectral regions of the (13)C NMR spectra of soil OC, except for the carbonyl fraction (165-220ppm), which may reflect the low OC content of the soils from both landuses. For all chemicals, except prometryne, the most significant (P<0.01 or P<0.001) relationship between K(d) values and types of OC was found with the aromatic (110-165ppm) or the alkyl (0-45ppm) fraction. A comparison was made of the variability of K(d) values normalized over OC (i.e. K(oc)), alkyl, aromatic and alkyl+aromatic fractions. Expressing K(d) values for all chemicals, except azinphos methyl, in soils under native vegetation as K(alkyl) or K(aromatic) greatly decreased the variability compared with the K(oc) value. However in the cultivated soils only the sorption coefficients for DEA, DIA and fenamiphos showed a decrease in variability when expressed as K(alkyl) or K(aromatic). This reflected the stronger relationship between sorption coefficients and the alkyl and aromatic fraction of soil OC in soils from native vegetation compared with those determined from the market garden soils. The different relationships between sorption coefficients and types of OC of the two landuses also suggests that the type of aromatic and alkyl carbon under the two landuses is different and NMR characterisation of the OC was not sufficient to distinguish these differences.

摘要

早期研究表明,从两种土地利用类型(原生植被和商品菜园)采集的土壤对九种农药的吸附存在显著差异,而仅根据有机碳含量无法解释这些差异。因此,有人推测这两种土地利用类型之间吸附行为的差异可能是由于有机碳化学性质的变化所致。在本研究中,通过固态(13)C核磁共振光谱法测定了九种化学物质的吸附行为与土壤有机碳化学性质之间的关系。除羰基部分(165 - 220ppm)外,两种土地利用类型的土壤有机碳(13)C核磁共振光谱的四个主要光谱区域的分布没有显著差异,羰基部分的差异可能反映了两种土地利用类型土壤的有机碳含量较低。对于所有化学物质,除了扑草净,在K(d)值与有机碳类型之间发现的最显著(P<0.01或P<0.001)关系是与芳香族(110 - 165ppm)或烷基(0 - 45ppm)部分相关。对基于有机碳标准化的K(d)值(即K(oc))、烷基、芳香族和烷基 + 芳香族部分的变异性进行了比较。将原生植被下土壤中除甲基谷硫磷外的所有化学物质的K(d)值表示为K(烷基)或K(芳香族),与K(oc)值相比,变异性大大降低。然而,在耕作土壤中,只有DEA、DIA和苯线磷的吸附系数在表示为K(烷基)或K(芳香族)时变异性降低。这反映出与商品菜园土壤相比,原生植被土壤中吸附系数与土壤有机碳的烷基和芳香族部分之间的关系更强。两种土地利用类型的吸附系数与有机碳类型之间的不同关系还表明,两种土地利用类型下芳香族和烷基碳的类型不同,并且有机碳的核磁共振表征不足以区分这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验