分离性身份障碍中的程序性记忆：何时才能真正确定身份间失忆？
Procedural memory in dissociative identity disorder: when can inter-identity amnesia be truly established?
作者信息
Huntjens Rafaële J C, Postma Albert, Woertman Liesbeth, van der Hart Onno, Peters Madelon L
机构信息
Department of Clinical Psychology, Research Institute for Psychology and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Jun;14(2):377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.001. Epub 2004 Nov 25.
In a serial reaction time task, procedural memory was examined in Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). Thirty-one DID patients were tested for inter-identity transfer of procedural learning and their memory performance was compared with 25 normal controls and 25 controls instructed to simulate DID. Results of patients seemed to indicate a pattern of inter-identity amnesia. Simulators, however, were able to mimic a pattern of inter-identity amnesia, rendering the results of patients impossible to interpret as either a pattern of amnesia or a pattern of simulation. It is argued that studies not including DID-simulators or simulation-free memory tasks, should not be taken as evidence for (or against) amnesia in DID.
在一项连续反应时任务中，对分离性身份障碍（DID）患者的程序性记忆进行了检查。对31名DID患者进行了程序性学习的身份间转移测试，并将他们的记忆表现与25名正常对照者以及25名被指示模拟DID的对照者进行了比较。患者的结果似乎表明存在身份间失忆的模式。然而，模拟者能够模仿身份间失忆的模式，这使得患者的结果无法被解释为失忆模式或模拟模式。有人认为，不包括DID模拟者或无模拟记忆任务的研究，不应被视为支持（或反对）DID失忆的证据。
Zotero 插件