Olson Ardis L, Dietrich Allen J, Prazar Gregory, Hurley James, Tuddenham Ann, Hedberg Viking, Naspinsky Deborah A
Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Jun;26(3):169-76. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200506000-00002.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended depression screening for adults. Screening mothers has special importance to pediatricians because of the impact of maternal depression on children. The two screening questions endorsed by the USPSTF may allow pediatricians to screen mothers during routine well child care. This study explores the feasibility and yield of interview- and paper-based pediatric screening for maternal depression during well child visits. A structured interview script was developed to inquire about maternal depression. It included the two-question screen and required less than 1 minute to administer. An alternative paper-based screen asked the two questions after a brief written introduction providing the rationale. Four community pediatric practices in New Hampshire and Maine were trained in both screening approaches and developed plans on how to respond to positive screens (either question positive). The 11 providers at these sites tested the two approaches on two different series of mothers at well child visits. The pediatricians also reported barriers to the screening inquiries, maternal responses, and subsequent clinician actions and referrals. The pediatricians screened 250 mothers via the scripted interview. In a second trial, 223 women had paper-based depression screening. Yields from the paper-based screen were 22.9% versus 5.7% for the interview-based screener. Pediatricians also took on the new role of discussion of possible depression in about two thirds of cases. Subsequently, 7.6% of all women with paper-based screening were referred to mental health versus 1.6% with the interview-based screening. With the interview, mothers of children younger than 1 year of age were less likely to screen positive than those with older children (1.9% vs. 8.5%, p = .04). With the paper-based screener, no age differences in positive screen rates occurred. While both approaches to screening were feasible in primary care, the yield from the two different approaches differed substantially. This finding deserves exploration in future studies. With either of these screening approaches, pediatricians could enhance their detection of mothers at risk of depression. The outcomes of pediatrician screening and the best approach to follow-up care still need to be determined.
美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议对成年人进行抑郁症筛查。由于母亲抑郁症对孩子有影响,对母亲进行筛查对儿科医生尤为重要。USPSTF认可的两个筛查问题或许能让儿科医生在儿童定期健康检查期间对母亲进行筛查。本研究探讨在儿童健康检查期间,通过访谈和纸质方式对母亲抑郁症进行儿科筛查的可行性及筛查结果。制定了一份结构化访谈脚本以询问母亲的抑郁症情况。它包含这两个问题的筛查,且实施时间不到1分钟。另一种基于纸质的筛查在简短书面介绍其原理后询问这两个问题。新罕布什尔州和缅因州的四家社区儿科诊所接受了这两种筛查方法的培训,并制定了应对筛查呈阳性(任一问题呈阳性)的应对计划。这些诊所的11名医护人员在儿童健康检查时,在两组不同的母亲中测试了这两种方法。儿科医生还报告了筛查询问的障碍、母亲的反应以及随后临床医生的行动和转诊情况。儿科医生通过脚本访谈对250名母亲进行了筛查。在第二项试验中,223名女性接受了基于纸质的抑郁症筛查。基于纸质筛查的阳性率为22.9%,而基于访谈筛查的阳性率为5.7%。在约三分之二的病例中,儿科医生还承担了讨论可能存在的抑郁症这一新角色。随后,所有接受纸质筛查的女性中有7.6%被转介至心理健康机构,而接受访谈筛查的这一比例为1.6%。通过访谈,1岁以下儿童的母亲筛查呈阳性的可能性低于年龄较大儿童的母亲(1.9%对8.5%,p = 0.04)。使用基于纸质的筛查工具时,阳性筛查率没有年龄差异。虽然两种筛查方法在初级保健中都是可行的,但两种不同方法的筛查结果差异很大。这一发现值得在未来研究中进一步探讨。采用这两种筛查方法中的任何一种,儿科医生都可以提高对有抑郁症风险母亲的检测率。儿科医生筛查结果以及后续最佳护理方法仍有待确定。