Leslie Laurel K, Gordon Jeanne N, Meneken Lee, Premji Kamila, Michelmore Katherine L, Ganger William
Child & Adolescent Services Research Center, Children's Hospital, San Diego, California 92123-0282, USA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Jun;26(3):177-85. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200506000-00003.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends comprehensive assessments for children entering foster care. These children may be placed with biological parents, kin, or in nonrelative foster care. It is not known whether health-related needs differ by placement. Chart abstractions were conducted of child welfare and medical records of 1542 children, ages 3 months to 5 years 11 months, admitted to San Diego's sole emergency shelter/receiving facility from April 1, 1998, through June 30, 1999, for investigation of alleged maltreatment. Children were discharged to three placement types: biological parents (28.5%), kinship caregivers (28.4%), or nonrelative foster parents (43.1%). Overall, 86.7% of children studied demonstrated physical, developmental, or mental health needs, with more than half displaying two or more problems. More than half of the children had a "Suspect" score on the Denver-II; 70.3% of children with "Suspect" scores were found to have delay on a developmental evaluation. Almost one tenth of the sample were diagnosed with one or more mental health conditions. Few differences were found for physical, developmental, or mental health concerns by placement. Results suggest that young children placed with biological parents or in kinship care have similar needs to those of children placed with foster parents. This study confirms the importance of comprehensive assessments for young children removed from their homes, regardless of placement. It also illustrates a need for standardized assessment criteria, particularly for developmental and mental health status, and for collaborative care models for all young children entering the child welfare system, regardless of their placement following investigation.
美国儿科学会建议对进入寄养系统的儿童进行全面评估。这些儿童可能被安置在亲生父母、亲属身边,或进入非亲属寄养家庭。目前尚不清楚与健康相关的需求是否因安置方式而异。研究人员对1542名年龄在3个月至5岁11个月之间的儿童的儿童福利和医疗记录进行了图表摘要分析,这些儿童于1998年4月1日至1999年6月30日期间被送往圣地亚哥唯一的紧急避难所/接收设施,接受涉嫌虐待情况的调查。儿童被安置到三种类型的家庭:亲生父母(28.5%)、亲属照料者(28.4%)或非亲属寄养父母(43.1%)。总体而言,86.7%的被研究儿童表现出身体、发育或心理健康方面的需求,其中一半以上存在两个或更多问题。超过一半的儿童在丹佛发育筛查测验第二版(Denver-II)中得分为“可疑”;在发育评估中,70.3%得“可疑”分数的儿童被发现存在发育迟缓问题。近十分之一的样本被诊断出患有一种或多种心理健康疾病。在身体、发育或心理健康问题方面,不同安置方式之间几乎没有差异。结果表明,与被安置在寄养家庭中的儿童相比,被安置在亲生父母身边或亲属照料家庭中的幼儿有类似的需求。这项研究证实了对离家幼儿进行全面评估的重要性,无论其安置方式如何。它还表明需要标准化的评估标准,特别是针对发育和心理健康状况的标准,以及针对所有进入儿童福利系统的幼儿的合作式护理模式,无论他们在调查后的安置情况如何。