Suppr超能文献

安乐死与协助自杀:自由主义观点与传统道德观念的对比

Euthanasia and assisted suicide: a liberal approach versus the traditional moral view.

作者信息

Patterson Rachael, George Katrina

机构信息

Deakin University.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2005 May;12(4):494-510.

Abstract

Within the context of the debate over the recent suspended sentence given to John Stuart Godfrey by Underwood J in the Supreme Court of Tasmania for assisting his elderly mother with her suicide, this article examines some of the more popular arguments for and against the moral acceptability of euthanasia and assisted suicide. This article considers the arguments put forward on the "difference principle" by Rachels and Nesbitt before critically examining the liberal approach to the euthanasia issue as proposed by Kuhse. It is argued that whilst Kuhse is correct to reject the difference principle, she does so for the wrong reasons. The penultimate section of the article provides an overview of the traditional moral view against killing. The final part assesses whether the arguments put forward by proponents of the liberal approach are capable of overcoming this view.

摘要

在塔斯马尼亚最高法院的安德伍德法官最近对约翰·斯图尔特·戈弗雷因协助年迈母亲自杀而判处缓刑引发的辩论背景下,本文审视了一些关于安乐死和协助自杀在道德上是否可接受的较为流行的正反观点。本文先考虑了雷切尔斯和内斯比特提出的关于“差异原则”的论点,然后批判性地审视了库塞提出的关于安乐死问题的自由主义方法。有人认为,虽然库塞拒绝差异原则是正确的,但她这样做的理由是错误的。本文倒数第二部分概述了反对杀戮的传统道德观点。最后一部分评估了自由主义方法的支持者提出的论点是否能够克服这一观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验