Patterson Rachael, George Katrina
Deakin University.
J Law Med. 2005 May;12(4):494-510.
Within the context of the debate over the recent suspended sentence given to John Stuart Godfrey by Underwood J in the Supreme Court of Tasmania for assisting his elderly mother with her suicide, this article examines some of the more popular arguments for and against the moral acceptability of euthanasia and assisted suicide. This article considers the arguments put forward on the "difference principle" by Rachels and Nesbitt before critically examining the liberal approach to the euthanasia issue as proposed by Kuhse. It is argued that whilst Kuhse is correct to reject the difference principle, she does so for the wrong reasons. The penultimate section of the article provides an overview of the traditional moral view against killing. The final part assesses whether the arguments put forward by proponents of the liberal approach are capable of overcoming this view.
在塔斯马尼亚最高法院的安德伍德法官最近对约翰·斯图尔特·戈弗雷因协助年迈母亲自杀而判处缓刑引发的辩论背景下,本文审视了一些关于安乐死和协助自杀在道德上是否可接受的较为流行的正反观点。本文先考虑了雷切尔斯和内斯比特提出的关于“差异原则”的论点,然后批判性地审视了库塞提出的关于安乐死问题的自由主义方法。有人认为,虽然库塞拒绝差异原则是正确的,但她这样做的理由是错误的。本文倒数第二部分概述了反对杀戮的传统道德观点。最后一部分评估了自由主义方法的支持者提出的论点是否能够克服这一观点。