Suppr超能文献

分娩硬膜外镇痛期间意外硬膜穿破的处理:英国实践调查

The management of accidental dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia: a survey of UK practice.

作者信息

Baraz R, Collis R E

机构信息

Anaesthetic Specialist Registrar, Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):673-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04222.x.

Abstract

The management of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headache in obstetric practice continues to be of great interest. This survey aims to explore the current management of this complication in the United Kingdom and compares the findings to a similar survey undertaken in 1993. A postal questionnaire was sent to all maternity units (n = 248). The return rate was 71%. Of these, 144 units (85%) now have written guidelines for the management of accidental dural puncture compared to 58% in 1993. In 47 units (28%), the epidural catheter is now routinely placed intrathecally following accidental dural puncture; in 69 units (41%) the catheter is re-sited and in the remaining 53 units (31%) either option is allowed. This is in contrast to the previous survey, which found that catheters were re-sited in 99% of units. Only 31 units (18%) now limit the second stage of labour and 19 (11%) avoid pushing and deliver by ventouse or forceps, whilst 116 units (69%) allow labour to take place without any intervention. Only 44 units (26%) now treat postdural puncture headache with an epidural blood patch as soon as it is diagnosed, whereas in 120 units (71%) the blood patch is performed only after failure of conservative measures. Due to the large increase in the use of the intrathecal catheter following this complication, a follow-up questionnaire was posted 5 months later to those units (n = 99) that reported this practice in the initial survey, with a 94% response rate. The two most commonly cited reasons for intrathecal catheterisation were to avoid further dural puncture (76%) and to allow immediate analgesia for labour (75%).

摘要

产科实践中意外硬膜穿破及硬膜穿破后头痛的处理一直备受关注。本次调查旨在探究英国目前对该并发症的处理情况,并将结果与1993年进行的类似调查结果进行比较。向所有产科单位(n = 248)发送了邮政问卷。回复率为71%。其中,144个单位(85%)现在有关于意外硬膜穿破处理的书面指南,而1993年这一比例为58%。在47个单位(28%),意外硬膜穿破后现在常规将硬膜外导管置入鞘内;在69个单位(41%)重新放置导管,其余53个单位(31%)两种选择均可。这与之前的调查形成对比,之前的调查发现99%的单位会重新放置导管。现在只有31个单位(18%)限制第二产程,19个单位(11%)避免用力并采用真空吸引或产钳助产,而116个单位(69%)允许自然分娩而不进行任何干预。现在只有44个单位(26%)在诊断出硬膜穿破后头痛时立即用硬膜外血补丁治疗,而在120个单位(71%)中,只有在保守措施失败后才进行血补丁治疗。由于该并发症发生后鞘内导管使用量大幅增加,5个月后向最初调查中报告有此做法的单位(n = 99)发送了后续问卷,回复率为94%。鞘内置管最常被提及的两个原因是避免再次硬膜穿破(76%)和为分娩立即提供镇痛(75%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验