Murrie Daniel C, Cornell Dewey G, McCoy Wendy K
Department of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77341-2447, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Jun;29(3):323-42. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-2415-x.
This study investigated the potential influence of labeling a juvenile as psychopathic. Juvenile probation officers (JPOs; N = 260) rendered hypothetical recommendations based on eight mock psychological evaluations. The evaluations varied the presence of two diagnostic criteria (antisocial behavioral history and psychopathic personality traits) and diagnostic labels (psychopathy, conduct disorder, no diagnosis) in order to distinguish criterion effects from labeling effects. The diagnostic criteria of antisocial behavior had a substantial effect on JPO recommendations (effect sizes .50-.79), while the diagnostic criteria of psychopathic personality traits had a more limited effect. Surprisingly, diagnostic labels had little effect, and there were no appreciable differences between conduct disorder and psychopathy diagnoses. These findings illustrate the importance of distinguishing diagnostic criterion effects from diagnostic labeling effects.
本研究调查了给青少年贴上精神病态标签的潜在影响。青少年缓刑监督官(JPO;N = 260)根据八项模拟心理评估给出了假设性建议。这些评估改变了两种诊断标准(反社会行为史和精神病态人格特质)的存在情况以及诊断标签(精神病态、品行障碍、无诊断),以便区分标准效应和标签效应。反社会行为的诊断标准对JPO的建议有重大影响(效应大小为0.50 - 0.79),而精神病态人格特质的诊断标准影响较为有限。令人惊讶的是,诊断标签影响很小,品行障碍和精神病态诊断之间没有明显差异。这些发现说明了区分诊断标准效应和诊断标签效应的重要性。