Suppr超能文献

绝经后女性足跟定量超声检查与中心双能X线吸收法骨矿物质密度的相关性

Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

作者信息

Larijani Bagher, Dabbaghmanesh Mohammad Hossein, Aghakhani Shahriar, Sedaghat Mojtaba, Hamidi Zohreh, Rahimi Eiman

机构信息

Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14114, Iran.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jul;24(7):941-6. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.7.941.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we sought the proper cutoff level for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of the heel in identifying bone mineral density (BMD) categories as determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

With the use of DXA, BMD categories of the lumbar spine and different areas of the left femur of 420 healthy women according to World Health Organization definitions were determined. Quantitative ultrasonography of the heel was also performed in each subject. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and sensitivity and specificity of QUS to diagnose osteoporosis were examined at different points to identify the best cutoff level. The diagnostic agreement between the two techniques in identifying osteoporosis was assessed with kappa scores.

RESULTS

The kappa scores were 0.31 for the lumbar region and 0.5 for the femoral neck region. On the receiver operating characteristic study, a score of -1 was found to be the appropriate cutoff point for QUS studies, in which the sensitivity of QUS to diagnose BMD osteoporosis varied between 78% and 87.5% depending on the site of the DXA study. With the proposed cutoff point (-1), sensitivity and specificity of QUS in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 83.9% and 51%, respectively, and at the femoral neck were 84% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient agreement between QUS and DXA led to uncertainty on expected BMD in people tested by QUS. The proposed cutoff value could achieve higher sensitivity but only by accepting higher rates of false-positive results.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们探寻足跟定量超声检查(QUS)用于识别绝经后女性双能X线吸收法(DXA)所测定的骨密度(BMD)类别的合适临界值。

方法

根据世界卫生组织的定义,使用DXA测定了420名健康女性腰椎和左股骨不同部位的BMD类别。对每位受试者也进行了足跟定量超声检查。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线,并在不同点检查了QUS诊断骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性,以确定最佳临界值。用kappa值评估两种技术在识别骨质疏松症方面的诊断一致性。

结果

腰椎区域的kappa值为0.31,股骨颈区域的kappa值为0.5。在受试者工作特征研究中,发现QUS研究的合适临界值为-1,根据DXA研究的部位不同,QUS诊断BMD骨质疏松症的敏感性在78%至87.5%之间变化。采用提议的临界值(-1)时,QUS检测腰椎骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性分别为83.9%和51%,检测股骨颈骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性分别为84%和50%。

结论

QUS和DXA之间的一致性不足导致通过QUS检测的人群中预期BMD存在不确定性。提议的临界值可实现更高的敏感性,但只能通过接受更高的假阳性率来实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验