Miller Suellen, Billings Deborah L
Women's Global Health Imperative, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;50(4):341-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.03.004.
This case study of a woman who wants to terminate her pregnancy but does not have access to safe services explores the technical, ethical, and legal effects of the Mexico City Policy (Global Gag Rule) on health care providers working in developing countries. This woman's self-induced termination resulted in an incomplete abortion, and she sought care from a midwife. The current Mexico City Policy effectively limits a health care provider's ability to offer abortion services and counseling, even when these services are legal. The policy has an adverse impact on women's access to safe care. The provision of comprehensive postabortion care, not restricted by the Mexico City Policy, is the key to preventing abortion-related morbidity and mortality.
本案例研究了一名想要终止妊娠但无法获得安全服务的女性,探讨了墨西哥城政策(全球禁言令)对在发展中国家工作的医疗服务提供者的技术、伦理和法律影响。该名女性自行终止妊娠导致流产不完全,随后她向一名助产士寻求护理。当前的墨西哥城政策实际上限制了医疗服务提供者提供堕胎服务和咨询的能力,即便这些服务是合法的。该政策对女性获得安全护理产生了不利影响。不受墨西哥城政策限制地提供全面的堕胎后护理,是预防与堕胎相关的发病和死亡的关键。