Schroeder Tobias, Malagó Massimo, Debatin Jörg F, Goyen Mathias, Nadalin Silvio, Ruehm Stefan G
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Liver Transpl. 2005 Jul;11(7):776-787. doi: 10.1002/lt.20429.
In order to compare the performance of "all-in-one" magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and "all-in-one" multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the preharvest evaluation 25 potential living donors underwent both MRI and MDCT. MRI was performed on a high-performance 1.5-T scanner, computed tomography (CT) on a 4-row multidetector-scanner. Both scan protocols included angiography of the arterial and venous hepatic systems. CT additionally included infusion of a biliary contrast agent. Data analysis was performed by 4 reviewers, based on source images, multiplanar reformats, and three-dimensional (3D) postprocessing. Determination of image quality was based on a 4-point image quality rating (IQR) scale, ranging from 1 = nondiagnostic to 4 = excellent. Preoperative and intraoperative (n = 13) findings were correlated. Magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were generally well tolerated. Within the CT scan, 2 candidates presented moderate adverse reaction to the biliary contrast agent. MRI and CT showed the same benign parenchymal lesions (IQR MR: 3.7; IQR CT: 3.4). Determination of liver volumes was easier based on CT (IQR MR: 3.3; IQR CT: 3.6). Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) revealed 10 variants of the arterial liver supply (IQR: 3.0) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) revealed 13 variants (IQR: 3.5). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) identified 4 biliary variants (IQR: 1.3) and CT cholangiography identified 17 (IQR: 3.5). MRI and CT each showed 4 hepatic and portal venous variants (IQR MR: 3.4, CT: 2.8). CT and MR findings correlated well with intraoperative findings. In conclusion, both techniques proved to be efficient to evaluate potential living liver donors' anatomy in a single diagnostic step. The main advantage of CT lies in the ability to accurately assess the biliary anatomy.
为比较“一体化”磁共振成像(MRI)和“一体化”多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)在术前评估中的表现,对25名潜在活体供者同时进行了MRI和MDCT检查。MRI检查使用高性能1.5-T扫描仪,计算机断层扫描(CT)使用4排多排探测器扫描仪。两种扫描方案均包括肝动脉和静脉系统的血管造影。CT检查还额外注入了胆道造影剂。由4名审阅者基于源图像、多平面重组图像和三维(3D)后处理进行数据分析。图像质量的判定基于4分图像质量评分(IQR)量表,范围从1分(无法诊断)到4分(优秀)。将术前和术中(n = 13)的检查结果进行相关性分析。磁共振(MR)检查一般耐受性良好。在CT扫描过程中,有2名候选者对胆道造影剂出现中度不良反应。MRI和CT显示出相同的良性实质病变(IQR MR:3.7;IQR CT:3.4)。基于CT更容易确定肝脏体积(IQR MR:3.3;IQR CT:3.6)。磁共振血管造影(MRA)显示了10种肝动脉供应变异(IQR:3.0),计算机断层血管造影(CTA)显示了13种变异(IQR:3.5)。磁共振胆胰管造影(MRCP)识别出4种胆道变异(IQR:1.3),CT胆管造影识别出17种(IQR:3.5)。MRI和CT各自显示出4种肝静脉和门静脉变异(IQR MR:3.4,CT:2.8)。CT和MR检查结果与术中检查结果相关性良好。总之,两种技术在单次诊断步骤中均被证明能有效地评估潜在活体肝供者的解剖结构。CT的主要优势在于能够准确评估胆道解剖结构。