Kozower Benjamin D, Moon Marc R, Barner Hendrick B, Moazami Nader, Lawton Jennifer S, Pasque Michael K, Damiano Ralph J
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1013, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jul;80(1):112-6; discussion 116-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.017.
Complete revascularization is important in young patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, but this principle remains less absolute in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to determine how complete revascularization influenced long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians.
From 1986 to 2003, 500 consecutive patients 80 to 94 years of age underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Complete revascularization was defined as placement of at least one graft to each of the three major vascular regions that included a 50% diameter lesion. Revascularization was complete in 400 (80%) patients and incomplete in 100 (20%) patients. Mean (+/- standard deviation) follow-up was 51 +/- 41 months and was 99% complete (2,102 total patient-years).
Operative mortality was 8% +/- 2% (+/-95% confidence interval) and was statistically lower with complete (7% +/- 3%) versus incomplete (13% +/- 7%) revascularization (p < 0.05). Of 459 operative survivors, there were 261 late deaths. Multivariate regression analysis identified six independent predictors of late death: earlier operative year, male sex, peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, and incomplete revascularization (p < 0.03 for all). Excluding operative deaths, mean survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 82 months with complete revascularization compared with 65 months with incomplete revascularization (p < 0.008). Survival was 62% +/- 3% with complete versus 45% +/- 6% with incomplete revascularization at 5 years and 39% +/- 3% with complete versus 25% +/- 6% with incomplete revascularization at 8 years (p < 0.008).
In octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, complete revascularization correlated with improved long-term survival, increasing mean survival by almost 25% compared with incomplete revascularization.
对于接受冠状动脉搭桥术的年轻患者,完全血运重建很重要,但这一原则在老年患者中并非绝对。本研究的目的是确定完全血运重建如何影响八旬老人冠状动脉搭桥术后的长期生存。
1986年至2003年,500例年龄在80至94岁的连续患者接受了冠状动脉搭桥术。完全血运重建定义为在包括直径50%病变的三个主要血管区域各放置至少一根移植血管。400例(80%)患者实现了完全血运重建,100例(20%)患者血运重建不完全。平均(±标准差)随访时间为51±41个月,随访完成率为99%(总计2102患者年)。
手术死亡率为8%±2%(±95%置信区间),完全血运重建组(7%±3%)的手术死亡率在统计学上低于不完全血运重建组(13%±7%)(p<0.05)。在459例手术幸存者中,有261例晚期死亡。多因素回归分析确定了晚期死亡的六个独立预测因素:手术年份较早、男性、外周或脑血管疾病、充血性心力衰竭以及血运重建不完全(所有p<0.03)。排除手术死亡病例后,完全血运重建组的平均生存时间(Kaplan-Meier法)为82个月,而不完全血运重建组为65个月(p<0.008)。完全血运重建组5年生存率为62%±3%,不完全血运重建组为45%±6%;8年生存率分别为39%±3%和25%±6%(p<0.008)。
在接受冠状动脉搭桥术的八旬老人中,完全血运重建与改善长期生存相关,与不完全血运重建相比,平均生存时间增加近25%。