Suppr超能文献

情绪唤起事件的记忆一致性:前瞻性研究与实验研究综述

Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: a review of prospective and experimental studies.

作者信息

van Giezen Anne E, Arensman Ella, Spinhoven Philip, Wolters Gezinus

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):935-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.011.

Abstract

Although emotionally arousing events are more memorable than ordinary daily life events, the nature of memories for emotionally arousing events is widely debated. On the one hand, researchers consider memories for highly emotional events as malleable and subject to distortion, while on the other hand these memories are perceived as both indelible and consistent over the lifetime. Up till now, a systematic comparison of research findings on consistency of memory for emotional events is lacking. This paper is the first effort to summarize available studies on consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events and to address methodological limitations and suggestions for future research as well. In general, findings show that quality of the selected studies is sufficient to good, with studies with victims of assault and studies on war-exposure reaching higher quality scores than studies on flashbulb memories and experimental memory studies. Victims of assault or war-exposure tend to amplify their memories for the event, while results from flashbulb memory research and experimental research suggest that memory for emotional events is either stable or diminishes over time.

摘要

尽管情绪唤起事件比日常普通生活事件更令人难忘,但关于情绪唤起事件的记忆本质仍存在广泛争议。一方面,研究人员认为高度情绪化事件的记忆具有可塑性且容易失真,而另一方面,这些记忆在一生中被视为不可磨灭且一致的。到目前为止,缺乏对情绪事件记忆一致性研究结果的系统比较。本文首次尝试总结关于情绪唤起事件记忆一致性的现有研究,并解决方法学上的局限性以及对未来研究的建议。总体而言,研究结果表明所选研究的质量从足够到良好,遭受攻击的受害者研究和战争暴露研究的质量得分高于闪光灯记忆研究和实验记忆研究。遭受攻击或战争暴露的受害者倾向于夸大他们对事件的记忆,而闪光灯记忆研究和实验研究的结果表明,情绪事件的记忆要么稳定,要么随时间减弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验