Modeling attacks on the food supply.
作者信息
Alberts Bruce
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 12;102(28):9737-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504944102. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Modeling attacks on the food supply.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 12;102(28):9737-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504944102. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
2
Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 12;102(28):9984-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408526102. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
3
Risks and benefits of dual-use research.
Nature. 2005 Jun 16;435(7044):855. doi: 10.1038/435855a.
4
Mathematically assessing the consequences of food terrorism scenarios.
J Food Sci. 2008 Sep;73(7):M346-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00874.x. Epub 2008 Aug 18.
5
Title III of the Bioterrorism Act: sacrificing U.S. trade relations in the name of food security.
Am Univ Law Rev. 2007 Jan;56(3):667-718.
6
Biosecurity with 'bio-sense'.
Nat Immunol. 2004 Dec;5(12):1191. doi: 10.1038/ni1204-1191.
7
Data security. Report upholds public access to genetic codes.
Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1692. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5691.1692a.
8
Scientific publication. HHS Asks PNAS to pull bioterrorism paper.
Science. 2005 Jun 3;308(5727):1395. doi: 10.1126/science.308.5727.1395b.
9
Better plan needed to protect U.S. agriculture from bioterrorism.
J Environ Health. 2003 Mar;65(7):40.
10
Agroterrorism: the risks to the United States food supply and national security.
US Army Med Dep J. 2015 Jan-Mar:9-15.
引用本文的文献
1
Meanwhile, back "At the National Academies".
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 18;117(7):3343-3344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000110117.
2
On the need for a national board to assess dual use research of concern.
J Virol. 2014 Jun;88(12):6535-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00875-14. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
3
One study, two paths: the challenge of dual-use research.
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jun;120(6):A238-42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.120-a238.
4
Scientific Autonomy and Public Oversight.
Episteme (Edinb). 2008 Jun 1;5(2):220-238. doi: 10.3366/E1742360008000336.
5
Democracy, individual rights and the regulation of science.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):407-29. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9145-2. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
6
The problems with forbidding science.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):375-94. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9130-9. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
7
What is "dual use" research? A response to Miller and Selgelid.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Mar;15(1):3-5. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9104-3. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
8
Neuroethics, national security and secrecy.
Am J Bioeth. 2007 May;7(5):14-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160701290264.
9
Empowerment and restraint in scientific communication. New developments make it easier to share information, but more difficult to deal with dual-use biology.
EMBO Rep. 2006 Jul;7 Spec No(Spec No):S18-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400710.
10
When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.
EMBO Rep. 2006 Jul;7 Spec No(Spec No):S10-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400726.
本文引用的文献
1
PNAS policy on publication of sensitive material in the life sciences.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630514100. Epub 2003 Feb 15.
Zotero 插件