Välimäki M, Taipale J, Kaltiala-Heino R
University of Tampere, Department of Nursing Science, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Nov;8(6):522-32. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800606.
This article is concerned with the deprivation of patients' liberty while undergoing psychiatric treatment, with special reference to the situation in Finland. It is based on a review of Finnish law, health care statistics, and empirical and theoretical studies. Relevant research findings from other countries are also discussed. In Finland, it is required that patients are cared for by mutual understanding with themselves; coercive measures may be applied only if they are necessary for the treatment of the illness, or for safeguarding patients' safety or the safety of others. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization is closely regulated by the Mental Health Act. However, the rules concerning the deprivation of liberty during inpatient treatment (by seclusion, restraint and restricted leave) are formulated in very general terms. Therefore, Finnish psychiatric hospitals have their own policies concerning when and how seclusion may be used. The practice of seclusion and the use of restraint therefore vary among the psychiatric hospitals in Finland.
本文关注的是患者在接受精神科治疗期间的自由被剥夺问题,特别提及芬兰的情况。它基于对芬兰法律、医疗保健统计数据以及实证和理论研究的综述。同时也讨论了其他国家的相关研究结果。在芬兰,要求通过与患者的相互理解来照顾他们;只有在治疗疾病、保障患者自身安全或他人安全有必要时,才可以采取强制措施。非自愿精神科住院受到《精神健康法》的严格规范。然而,关于住院治疗期间(通过隔离、约束和限制外出)剥夺自由的规定表述得非常笼统。因此,芬兰的精神病院有自己关于何时以及如何使用隔离的政策。所以,芬兰各精神病院在隔离措施的实施和约束手段的使用方面存在差异。