• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[药物信息中心——卫生保健研究的工具?]

[Drug information centers-instruments for health care research?].

作者信息

Hach Isabel, Meusel Dirk, Maywald Ulf, Kirch Wilhelm

机构信息

Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie Forschungsverbund Public Health Sachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt e. V., Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 27, 01307 Dresden.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Jul 15;100(7):396-400. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1054-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00063-005-1054-9
PMID:16010474
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient- and physician-centered drug information services (DICs) can contribute to a better communication between doctors and patients and health care research. Furthermore, gaps within health care can be identified.

METHODS

Data of two DICs (the physician-centered service is in operation for almost 10 years, the patient-centered service since 2001), both established in the Institute of Clinical Pharmacology of the TU Dresden, Germany, were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The consultation frequency in both DICs was high (2004: 129 enquiries by physicians; 1,358 by patients). Questions concerning highly prevalent drug groups, i. e., cardiovascular drugs (physicians: 20%; patients: 30%) and drugs targeting the central nervous system (physicians: 22%; patients: 17%) were asked most frequently.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that patient's drug information in primary care needs improvement. Although in both DICs similar drug groups were asked, the authors suggest that the time factor is the core obstacle to sufficient information rather than knowledge deficits of physicians.

摘要

背景

以患者和医生为中心的药物信息服务(DIC)有助于改善医患之间的沟通以及医疗保健研究。此外,还能发现医疗保健领域存在的差距。

方法

对德国德累斯顿工业大学临床药理研究所设立的两个DIC的数据(以医生为中心的服务已运行近10年,以患者为中心的服务自2001年起运行)进行描述性统计分析。

结果

两个DIC的咨询频率都很高(2004年:医生咨询129次;患者咨询1358次)。关于高流行药物组的问题,即心血管药物(医生:20%;患者:30%)和针对中枢神经系统的药物(医生:22%;患者:17%)被询问的频率最高。

结论

结果表明,初级保健中患者的药物信息需要改进。尽管两个DIC中被询问的药物组相似,但作者认为时间因素是获取充分信息的核心障碍,而非医生的知识不足。

相似文献

1
[Drug information centers-instruments for health care research?].[药物信息中心——卫生保健研究的工具?]
Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Jul 15;100(7):396-400. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1054-9.
2
Regional drug information service.区域药品信息服务
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;37(6):263-8.
3
Drug information for patients--an update of long-term results: type of enquiries and patient characteristics.患者用药信息——长期结果更新:咨询类型与患者特征
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Feb;18(2):111-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1682.
4
[Drug information for patients -- unmet needs, evaluation and influence on the compliance].[患者用药信息——未满足的需求、评估及其对依从性的影响]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005 Jun 17;130(24):1485-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870843.
5
Information-seeking behaviors and attitudes of physicians toward drug information centers in Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Med J. 2008 Jan;29(1):107-15.
6
First patient-centered drug information service in Germany--a descriptive study.德国首个以患者为中心的药物信息服务——一项描述性研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;38(12):2154-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E210. Epub 2004 Nov 2.
7
[Morbidity and healthcare differences between insured in the statutory ("GKV") and private health insurance ("PKV") in Germany. Review of empirical studies].[德国法定医疗保险(“GKV”)和私人医疗保险(“PKV”)参保者之间的发病率及医疗差异。实证研究综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):925-38. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1119-7.
8
[Dietary supplements--evaluation of patient inquiries at a drug information service].[膳食补充剂——药物信息服务中患者咨询的评估]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Apr;137(17):881-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299039. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
Influence of attitudes, normative beliefs, and situational variables on physicians' use of pharmacists as drug information consultants.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980 Apr;37(4):483-91.
10
Twenty years' experience with drug information centers.药物信息中心的二十年经验。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983 Jul;40(7):1172-8.

引用本文的文献

1
[6-year experience with a drug information service for patients].
Med Klin (Munich). 2009 Mar 15;104(3):220-4. doi: 10.1007/s00063-009-1035-5. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
2
[Drug information services for physicians and patients. Acceptance and benefits].
Internist (Berl). 2007 Sep;48(9):1029-35. doi: 10.1007/s00108-007-1829-6.