Potkin Steven G, Keck Paul E, Segal Scott, Ice Kathleen, English Patricia
Neuropsychiatric Center, University of California-Irvine, 101 City Drive South, Bldg. 3, Orange, CA 92868-3298, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;25(4):301-10. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000169068.34322.70.
In an earlier 21-day, placebo-controlled trial, ziprasidone was efficacious in improving symptoms of mania and was well tolerated. To confirm these results, a similarly designed 21-day trial was conducted.
Inpatients with bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed, were randomized to ziprasidone (40 to 80 mg BID) or placebo. Efficacy rating scales were derived from the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Change Bipolar Scale (SADS-CB). SADS-CB-derived Mania Rating Scale (MRS) total score was the primary efficacy parameter. Secondary SADS-CB-derived efficacy parameters included Manic Syndrome and Behavior and Ideation Subscales, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were also assessed.
Sixty-five placebo and 137 ziprasidone patients were evaluable for efficacy. Baseline-to-endpoint mean changes in MRS scores were -11.1 for ziprasidone and -5.6 for placebo (all patients, last observation carried forward [LOCF]; P < 0.01). Ziprasidone produced significantly greater improvements in Manic Syndrome (P < or = 0.01) and Behavior and Ideation Subscales (P < or = 0.001), CGI-S score, (P < or = 0.001), PANSS Total (P < or = 0.01) and Positive Subscale (P < or = 0.001) scores, and GAF (P < or = 0.001). With ziprasidone, significant improvements were observed from Day 2 onward for MRS and CGI-S at all time points except Day 4 for MRS. Treatment-related discontinuations due to adverse events were 5.8% for ziprasidone and 1.5% for placebo (P = 0.20).
Ziprasidone was well tolerated, rapidly efficacious, and superior to placebo in improving symptoms and global illness severity in these inpatients with acute bipolar mania, both manic and mixed episodes.
在一项早期的为期21天的安慰剂对照试验中,齐拉西酮在改善躁狂症状方面有效且耐受性良好。为了证实这些结果,进行了一项设计相似的为期21天的试验。
将双相I型障碍躁狂或混合发作的住院患者随机分为齐拉西酮组(40至80mg,每日两次)或安慰剂组。疗效评定量表源自情感障碍和精神分裂症日程表-双相变化量表(SADS-CB)。SADS-CB衍生的躁狂评定量表(MRS)总分是主要疗效参数。SADS-CB衍生的次要疗效参数包括躁狂综合征、行为和观念分量表、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)以及蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)。还评估了临床总体印象-严重程度量表(CGI-S)、功能总体评定量表(GAF)以及阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)。
65名安慰剂组患者和137名齐拉西酮组患者可进行疗效评估。MRS评分从基线到终点的平均变化,齐拉西酮组为-11.1,安慰剂组为-5.6(所有患者,末次观察结转[LOCF];P<0.01)。齐拉西酮在躁狂综合征(P≤0.01)、行为和观念分量表(P≤0.001)、CGI-S评分(P≤0.001)、PANSS总分(P≤0.01)和阳性分量表(P≤0.001)评分以及GAF(P≤0.001)方面产生了显著更大的改善。使用齐拉西酮时,除MRS在第4天外,从第2天起在所有时间点MRS和CGI-S均观察到显著改善。因不良事件导致的与治疗相关的停药率,齐拉西酮组为5.8%,安慰剂组为1.5%(P = 0.20)。
在这些急性双相躁狂(包括躁狂和混合发作)住院患者中,齐拉西酮耐受性良好、起效迅速,在改善症状和整体疾病严重程度方面优于安慰剂。