Lamar Daniel S, Bartolozzi Arthur R, Freedman Kevin B, Nagda Sameer H, Fawcett Clifford
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2005 Jul;21(7):809-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.03.003.
Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common, representing 10% to 28% of all ACL tears. Untreated partial tears of the ACL may go on to complete rupture in up to 42% of cases, and as few as 30% of patients return to their preinjury activity level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal modification for the treatment of partial tears of the ACL.
A prospective, nonrandomized consecutive case series.
Thirteen patients with a partial tear of a native ACL were treated with thermal modification of the ACL. All patients had a preoperative office examination significant for an end-point to Lachman examination and pivot-glide. All patients had bilateral preoperative KT-1000 measurements. All tears were confirmed by arthroscopy to constitute a 50% or less loss of structural integrity of the ligament. The ACL underwent thermal modification using the Oratec thermal probe (Oratec Interventions, Menlo Park, CA), and was examined by intraoperative KT-1000 testing. Patients were evaluated postoperatively at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months by office examination and functional outcome scoring.
KT-1000 arthrometer testing revealed a mean side-to-side difference of 4.35 mm preoperatively (SD = 1.1 mm). At the most recent follow-up, averaging 23 months (range, 18 to 28 months), 10 patients had a negative Lachman examination and no pivot-shift. Two patients had persistent grade II Lachman and complaints of giving way 3 months postoperative. Both patients underwent ACL reconstruction. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 10 patients, all patients achieved full extension, and the average flexion range of motion was 131 degrees (SD = 5.6). Compared with the preoperative KT-1000 arthrometer testing, the most recent evaluation revealed a decrease in mean side-to-side difference to 1.9 mm (SD = 1.5 mm). At most recent follow-up, the mean Lysholm score was 96.3 (SD = 4.4), the mean Tegner score was 6.1 (SD = 1.2), and the mean Cincinnati score was 94 (SD = 3.0).
With cautious application, thermal modification may be a viable treatment option for partial tears of the ACL in a select subset of patients. Further investigation is necessary to determine the long-term effectiveness of this procedure.
Level IV, Therapeutic Case Series Study (no or historical control group).
前交叉韧带(ACL)部分撕裂很常见,占所有ACL撕裂的10%至28%。未经治疗的ACL部分撕裂在高达42%的病例中可能会发展为完全断裂,只有30%的患者能恢复到伤前的活动水平。本研究的目的是评估热改性治疗ACL部分撕裂的有效性。
前瞻性、非随机连续病例系列。
13例原发性ACL部分撕裂患者接受了ACL热改性治疗。所有患者术前门诊检查均显示Lachman试验和轴移试验有明确终点。所有患者术前均进行了双侧KT-1000测量。所有撕裂均经关节镜检查证实韧带结构完整性丧失50%或更少。使用Oratec热探头(Oratec Interventions,加利福尼亚州门洛帕克)对ACL进行热改性,并通过术中KT-1000测试进行检查。术后6周以及术后3、6、12和24个月通过门诊检查和功能结果评分对患者进行评估。
KT-1000关节测量仪测试显示术前平均两侧差值为4.35 mm(标准差=1.1 mm)。在最近一次随访中,平均随访时间为23个月(范围18至28个月),10例患者Lachman试验为阴性且无轴移。2例患者术后3个月Lachman试验持续为II级且有打软腿主诉。这2例患者均接受了ACL重建。1例患者失访。其余10例患者均实现了完全伸直,平均屈曲活动范围为131度(标准差=5.6)。与术前KT-1000关节测量仪测试相比,最近一次评估显示平均两侧差值降至1.9 mm(标准差=1.5 mm)。在最近一次随访中,Lysholm平均评分为96.3(标准差=4.4),Tegner平均评分为6.1(标准差=1.2),辛辛那提平均评分为94(标准差=3.0)。
谨慎应用时,热改性可能是特定亚组ACL部分撕裂患者的一种可行治疗选择。需要进一步研究以确定该手术的长期有效性。
IV级,治疗性病例系列研究(无或有历史对照组)。