Hahn C A, Jones E L, Blivin J L, Sanders L L, Yu D, Dewhirst M W, Secord A A, Prosnitz L R
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2005 Jun;21(4):349-57. doi: 10.1080/02656730400022260.
Prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) in patients with refractory, residual or recurrent ovarian cancer receiving whole abdomen hyperthermia and intravenous liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy.
Treatment consisted of six cycles of intravenous liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg m2 followed by whole abdomen hyperthermia with each cycle delivered every 4 weeks. QoL assessment was performed at baseline, prior to each cycle of chemotherapy and every 3 months during follow-up using self-administered questionnaires. Global QoL was rated on a seven-point scale and specific domains of QoL, disease related symptoms and treatment related toxicity were rated on a four-point scale.
Thirty-two patients were enrolled on the study and 129 QoL questionnaires were completed. Average age was 57.9 (range 45-76); nine patients had persistent and 23 recurrent disease. Ten patients completed six cycles of therapy. Three patients returned follow-up surveys. Subjects rated their overall QoL and health at baseline as above average with mean scores 5.10 (95% CI=4.62-5.58) and 4.66 (95% CI=4.23-5.08), respectively. No significant change in overall QoL was found between baseline and cycles 4-6 of therapy. Mean ratings of overall health and subject reported differences in QoL between cycles were not significantly changed during therapy. Limited follow-up data were available, but scores suggest possible improvement in QoL for patients completing all therapy. Subjects rated the greatest negative impact on QoL in areas of role functioning and social functioning, where the mean (SD) over all cycles was 2.00 (0.67) and 1.98 (0.70), respectively. For physical symptoms, fatigue and sleep disturbance had the most negative impact on QoL with means (SD) of 2.26 (0.62) and 1.91 (0.70). The moderate treatment related toxicity seen in this study did not significantly impact patients reported QoL.
Patients with unfavourable ovarian cancer responding to intravenous liposomal doxorubicin and whole abdomen hyperthermia maintained above average QoL during therapy. Limited data on patients completing protocol therapy demonstrated possible improvement in QoL.
对接受全腹热疗和静脉注射脂质体阿霉素化疗的难治性、残留性或复发性卵巢癌患者的生活质量(QoL)进行前瞻性评估。
治疗包括六个周期的静脉注射脂质体阿霉素,剂量为40mg/m²,随后进行全腹热疗,每个周期每4周进行一次。使用自行填写的问卷在基线、每个化疗周期前以及随访期间每3个月进行一次QoL评估。总体QoL采用七点量表评分,QoL的特定领域、疾病相关症状和治疗相关毒性采用四点量表评分。
32名患者纳入研究,共完成129份QoL问卷。平均年龄为57.9岁(范围45 - 76岁);9名患者为持续性疾病,23名患者为复发性疾病。10名患者完成了六个周期的治疗。3名患者返回了随访调查。受试者在基线时对其总体QoL和健康状况的评分高于平均水平,平均得分分别为5.10(95%CI = 4.62 - 5.58)和4.66(95%CI = 4.23 - 5.08)。在基线与治疗的第4 - 6周期之间,总体QoL未发现显著变化。治疗期间,总体健康状况的平均评分以及受试者报告的各周期QoL差异均无显著变化。虽随访数据有限,但评分表明完成所有治疗的患者QoL可能有所改善。受试者认为对QoL负面影响最大的是角色功能和社会功能领域,所有周期的平均(标准差)分别为2.00(0.67)和1.98(0.70)。对于身体症状,疲劳和睡眠障碍对QoL的负面影响最大,平均(标准差)分别为2.26(0.62)和1.91(0.70)。本研究中观察到的中度治疗相关毒性并未对患者报告的QoL产生显著影响。
对静脉注射脂质体阿霉素和全腹热疗有反应的难治性卵巢癌患者在治疗期间维持了高于平均水平的QoL。关于完成方案治疗患者的有限数据表明QoL可能有所改善。