Suppr超能文献

气囊扩张术和肌切开术对贲门失弛缓症患者食管功能和形态的影响。

Effects of pneumatic dilation and myotomy on esophageal function and morphology in patients with achalasia.

作者信息

Gockel Ines, Junginger Theodor, Eckardt Volker F

机构信息

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. ; tDepartment of Gastroenterology, German Diagnostic Clinic, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2005 Feb;71(2):128-31.

Abstract

Only two treatment modalities-pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy-promise long-term relief from dysphagia and regurgitation in patients with achalasia. The objective of this study was to determine whether both options differ in their effects on esophageal function, morphology, and improvement in symptoms. Eighty-nine patients diagnosed with achalasia between January 1980 and December 2002 at a single center were enrolled in this study. Sixty-four patients underwent pneumatic dilation and 25 Heller myotomy in combination with an anterior semifundoplication (Dor procedure). Clinical evaluation (Eckardt-Score), esophageal manometry, and barium swallow were performed before and within 6 months after treatment. Our data shows that Heller myotomy reduces the LES resting pressure more markedly (7.9 [3.7-16.9] mm Hg) than pneumatic dilation (14.5 [2.7-36.0] mm Hg) (P < 0.0001) with similar pressures at diagnosis in both groups. Morphologic changes, assessed by the diameter of the esophageal corpus, were also more pronounced after surgical therapy (P > 0.05). Both options will lead to an immediate and significant improvement in symptoms, although the two treatment modalities did not differ in their subjective results. As only objective findings, such as those obtained by manometry and the timed barium swallow, have proven relevance for the assessment of long-term results, surgical therapy is the superior and more effective treatment option in patients with achalasia.

摘要

对于贲门失弛缓症患者,只有两种治疗方式——气囊扩张术和赫勒肌切开术有望长期缓解吞咽困难和反流症状。本研究的目的是确定这两种治疗方式对食管功能、形态及症状改善的影响是否存在差异。1980年1月至2002年12月期间在某单一中心诊断为贲门失弛缓症的89例患者纳入本研究。64例患者接受气囊扩张术,25例患者接受赫勒肌切开术联合前半胃底折叠术(Dor手术)。在治疗前及治疗后6个月内进行临床评估(埃卡德评分)、食管测压和吞钡检查。我们的数据显示,赫勒肌切开术比气囊扩张术更显著地降低LES静息压力(7.9 [3.7 - 16.9] mmHg对比14.5 [2.7 - 36.0] mmHg)(P < 0.0001),两组诊断时压力相似。通过食管体部直径评估的形态学变化在手术治疗后也更明显(P > 0.05)。两种治疗方式均能使症状立即得到显著改善,尽管两种治疗方式的主观结果无差异。由于只有诸如通过测压和定时吞钡检查获得的客观结果已被证明与长期结果评估相关,因此手术治疗是贲门失弛缓症患者更优且更有效的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验