Tseng Chin-Hsiao, Tseng Ching-Ping, Tai Tong-Yuan, Chong Choon-Khim
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Circ J. 2005 Aug;69(8):965-70. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.965.
The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of the clinical use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on the association between the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in elderly Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Two-hundred and ninety patients (108 men, 182 women) aged > or = 65 years (mean +/- SD, 71.6 +/-4.9) were cross-sectionally studied. ACR was expressed as the natural logarithm [ln(ACR)] and divided into normoalbuminuria (< 30.0 microg/mg) and albuminuria (> or = 30.0 microg/mg). ABI was evaluated both continuously and as peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (-) and PAD (+) using the cutoff of 0.9. Statistical analyses were performed with consideration of covariates and the use of ACEI/ARB. Results showed that in patients not using ACEI/ARB, ln (ACR) negatively correlated with ABI (r = -0.261, p < 0.01) and was associated with ABI with adjusted regression coefficient of -0.0213 (p < 0.05). PAD patients had a significantly higher level of ln (ACR) than those without PAD (4.83+/-1.34 vs 3.73+/-1.29, p < 0.001) and PAD prevalence was significantly higher in those with albuminuria than in those with normoalbuminuria (22.6% vs 4.9%, p < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio for PAD for every 1 unit increment of ln (ACR) was 2.10 (1.31-3.38), and for albuminuria vs normoalbuminuria 3.86 (1.04-14.31) in patients not using ACEI/ARB. In patients using ACEI/ARB, none of these analyses was significant. Patients using ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower risk of PAD with a multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of 0.34 (0.12-0.97).
ACR negatively correlates with ABI and is associated with PAD in elderly diabetic patients not treated with ACEI/ARB. The use of ACEI/ARB attenuates this association and may be associated with a lower risk of PAD.
本研究旨在探讨血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的临床应用对台湾老年2型糖尿病患者尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(ACR)与踝臂指数(ABI)或外周动脉疾病(PAD)之间关联的影响。
对290例年龄≥65岁(平均±标准差,71.6±4.9)的患者(108例男性,182例女性)进行横断面研究。ACR以自然对数[ln(ACR)]表示,并分为正常白蛋白尿(<30.0微克/毫克)和白蛋白尿(≥30.0微克/毫克)。ABI采用截断值0.9进行连续评估以及评估为外周动脉疾病(PAD)阴性和阳性。在考虑协变量和ACEI/ARB使用情况的基础上进行统计分析。结果显示,在未使用ACEI/ARB的患者中,ln(ACR)与ABI呈负相关(r = -0.261,p < 0.01),且经调整回归系数为-0.0213(p < 0.05)时与ABI相关。PAD患者的ln(ACR)水平显著高于无PAD患者(4.83±1.34 vs 3.73±1.29,p < 0.001),白蛋白尿患者的PAD患病率显著高于正常白蛋白尿患者(22.6% vs 4.9%,p < 0.001)。在未使用ACEI/ARB的患者中,ln(ACR)每增加1个单位,PAD的多变量调整比值比为2.10(1.31 - 3.38),白蛋白尿与正常白蛋白尿相比为3.86(1.04 - 14.31)。在使用ACEI/ARB的患者中,这些分析均无显著性差异。使用ACEI/ARB的患者发生PAD的风险显著降低,多变量调整比值比为0.34(0.12 - 0.97)。
在未接受ACEI/ARB治疗的老年糖尿病患者中,ACR与ABI呈负相关且与PAD有关。ACEI/ARB的使用减弱了这种关联,并且可能与较低的PAD风险相关。