Halum Stacey L, Patel Nalin, Smith Timothy L, Jaradeh Safwan, Toohill Robert J, Merati Albert L
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005 Jun;114(6):425-8. doi: 10.1177/000348940511400602.
Diagnostic and management strategies for adult unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI) vary among otolaryngologists. The aim of this study was to determine the current attitudes and practices regarding laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) for the management of adult UVFI within a cohort of subspecialty laryngologists.
A 19-item instrument focused on diagnosis and management of adult UVFI was mailed to active members (n = 249) of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA). The subset of questions related to LEMG is reviewed in this report. Statistical analysis using a chi2 test was performed.
The survey response rate was 34% (n = 84), with 8 surveys returned incomplete because of pediatric-limited practices. Of the respondents, 75% (n = 57) rely on LEMG for evaluation of UVFI, whereas 25% (n = 19) do not use LEMG. Of those who use LEMG, 54% place their own electrodes and 44% interpret the LEMG results themselves. Monopolar electrodes are used by 57% (n = 25), bipolar electrodes by 27% (n = 12), and hooked-wire electrodes by 17% (n = 7). Muscles evaluated by LEMG include the thyroarytenoid (100%), cricothyroid (94%), posterior cricoarytenoid (70%), lateral cricoarytenoid (43%), cricopharyngeus (27%), and interarytenoid (17%). The LEMG is performed in an unblinded fashion by most respondents (85%), and many (66%) feel a more accurate result is obtained when clinical information is known. There was no statistically significant difference in use of LEMG, placement of electrodes, and interpretation of LEMG according to percentage of laryngology practice.
The survey results demonstrate congruence among ABEA members in the utility of LEMG in the management of adult UVFI. Some variability was noted in the methods by which LEMG is performed and interpreted.
成人单侧声带麻痹(UVFI)的诊断和治疗策略在耳鼻喉科医生中存在差异。本研究的目的是确定一组喉科亚专科医生对成人UVFI管理中喉肌电图(LEMG)的当前态度和实践。
一份针对成人UVFI诊断和治疗的包含19个项目的问卷被邮寄给美国支气管食管协会(ABEA)的活跃成员(n = 249)。本报告回顾了与LEMG相关的问题子集。采用卡方检验进行统计分析。
调查回复率为34%(n = 84),8份问卷因儿科实践有限而未完整返回。在受访者中,75%(n = 57)依靠LEMG评估UVFI,而25%(n = 19)不使用LEMG。在使用LEMG的人中,54%自己放置电极,44%自己解读LEMG结果。57%(n = 25)使用单极电极,27%(n = 12)使用双极电极,17%(n = 7)使用钩线电极。通过LEMG评估的肌肉包括甲杓肌(100%)、环甲肌(94%)、后环杓肌(70%)、侧环杓肌(43%)、环咽肌(27%)和杓间肌(17%)。大多数受访者(85%)以非盲法进行LEMG检查,许多人(66%)认为在已知临床信息时能获得更准确的结果。根据喉科实践的百分比,在LEMG的使用、电极放置和LEMG解读方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
调查结果表明ABEA成员在LEMG对成人UVFI管理的效用方面意见一致。在LEMG的实施和解读方法上存在一些差异。