Suppr超能文献

美托洛尔和卡维地洛对慢性心力衰竭患者的日间心率有同等作用吗?

Do metoprolol and carvedilol have equivalent effects on diurnal heart rate in patients with chronic heart failure?

作者信息

Sanderson John E, Leung Leata Y C, Chan Skiva K W, Yip Gabriel W K, Fung Jeffrey W H, Yu C M

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 9th Fl Clinical Science Bldg, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2005 Aug;7(5):874-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.03.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol exerted a greater reduction in mortality than metoprolol tartrate in the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET). However, it is unclear if the degree and time course of beta1-blockade during a 24-h period was similar with each agent at the doses used. Therefore we analyzed 24-h ECG Holter recordings from a study which compared the long-term clinical efficacy of metoprolol tartrate to carvedilol in chronic heart failure patients using the same dosing regimen as in COMET.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with chronic heart failure with a mean LVEF 26+/-1.8% were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive metoprolol tartrate 50 mg bid or carvedilol 25 mg bid. 24-h ECG monitoring (Holter) was performed at baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year. Adequate quality recordings for analysis were obtained from 43 subjects at baseline, 42 at 12 weeks and 29 subjects at 1 year. Both drugs produced a fall in average 24-h heart rate from baseline at 12 weeks and at 1 year: metoprolol 88+/-3 to 71+/-2 and 69+/-3 bpm; carvedilol 83+/-3 to 70+/-2 and 70+/-3 bpm respectively (all p<0.001). The pattern of suppression of heart rate during the 24-h period was similar for both drugs.

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg bid and carvedilol 25 mg bid had similar effects on 24-h heart rate. This result suggests that the degree of beta1-blockade produced by these two drugs in these doses is comparable and the superior survival effect of carvedilol compared to metoprolol seen in COMET is likely to be due to actions of carvedilol other than beta1-blockade.

摘要

背景

在卡维地洛或美托洛尔欧洲试验(COMET)中,卡维地洛比酒石酸美托洛尔能更大程度地降低死亡率。然而,尚不清楚在使用的剂量下,每种药物在24小时期间β1受体阻滞的程度和时间过程是否相似。因此,我们分析了一项研究中的24小时动态心电图记录,该研究使用与COMET相同的给药方案,比较了酒石酸美托洛尔与卡维地洛在慢性心力衰竭患者中的长期临床疗效。

方法与结果

51例慢性心力衰竭患者,平均左室射血分数(LVEF)为26±1.8%,以双盲方式随机接受酒石酸美托洛尔50mg bid或卡维地洛25mg bid治疗。在基线、12周和1年时进行24小时动态心电图监测(Holter)。基线时从43名受试者、12周时从42名受试者和1年时从29名受试者获得了用于分析的质量足够的记录。两种药物在12周和1年时均使24小时平均心率从基线水平下降:酒石酸美托洛尔从88±3降至71±2和69±3次/分钟;卡维地洛分别从83±3降至70±2和70±3次/分钟(所有p<0.001)。两种药物在24小时期间心率抑制模式相似。

结论

酒石酸美托洛尔50mg bid和卡维地洛25mg bid对24小时心率有相似作用。该结果表明,这两种药物在这些剂量下产生的β1受体阻滞程度相当,在COMET中观察到的卡维地洛相比酒石酸美托洛尔的生存优势可能归因于卡维地洛除β1受体阻滞之外的其他作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验