West Charles Hutchison Keesor, Weiss Jay Michael
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Oct;182(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0048-x. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
This paper describes a new procedure for detecting effective antidepressant treatments. The procedure uses the swim-test susceptible (Susceptible) rat which has been selectively bred to show decreased struggling behavior in a swim test after exposure to a mild stressor. The ability of treatments to block this decrease in swim-test activity was assessed as a method for detecting effective antidepressants.
In both male and female Susceptible rats, chronic (14-day) treatment with different antidepressant drugs delivered via osmotic minipump [i.e., three tricyclics (desmethylimipramine, imipramine, amitriptyline), two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine and sertraline), a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (phenelzine), and two atypical antidepressants (venlafaxine and bupropion)] all prevented the stress-induced decrease in swim-test struggling normally shown by these rats. Electroconvulsive shock had a similar effect. Unlike antidepressant drugs, 14-day treatment with various non-antidepressant drugs [i.e., a stimulant (amphetamine), an anxiolytic (chlordiazepoxide), an antihistamine (chlorpheniramine), and an anticholinergic (scopolamine)] did not have this effect. Antidepressant drug treatment for 1 day (i.e., acute treatment) was also ineffective in this test. The procedure described above requires use of the Susceptible rat--swim test resistant rats (i.e., rats selectively bred to be resistant to decreased swim-test activity after exposure to stressful conditions) showed no significant differences in swim-test behavior between stress and nonstress conditions after 14-day drug treatment, and randomly bred Sprague-Dawley rats did not show a decrease in swim-test activity following exposure to the mild stressor that is the basis for the test.
These results suggest that the procedure described here, which uses a rat subject that has been bred for vulnerability to stressful conditions, may be a selective screening technique for effective antidepressant treatments.
本文描述了一种检测有效抗抑郁治疗方法的新程序。该程序使用了对游泳测试敏感(敏感)的大鼠,这种大鼠经过选择性培育,在暴露于轻度应激源后,在游泳测试中表现出挣扎行为减少。将治疗方法阻止游泳测试活动这种减少的能力作为检测有效抗抑郁药的一种方法进行评估。
在雄性和雌性敏感大鼠中,通过渗透微型泵给予不同抗抑郁药物进行慢性(14天)治疗[即三种三环类药物(去甲丙咪嗪、丙咪嗪、阿米替林)、两种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(氟西汀和舍曲林)、一种单胺氧化酶抑制剂(苯乙肼)以及两种非典型抗抑郁药(文拉法辛和安非他酮)]均能防止这些大鼠通常出现的应激诱导的游泳测试挣扎行为减少。电休克也有类似效果。与抗抑郁药物不同,用各种非抗抑郁药物进行14天治疗[即一种兴奋剂(苯丙胺)、一种抗焦虑药(氯氮卓)、一种抗组胺药(氯苯那敏)和一种抗胆碱能药(东莨菪碱)]没有这种效果。抗抑郁药物治疗1天(即急性治疗)在该测试中也无效。上述程序需要使用敏感大鼠——对游泳测试有抗性的大鼠(即经过选择性培育,在暴露于应激条件后对游泳测试活动减少有抗性的大鼠)在经过14天药物治疗后,应激和非应激条件下的游泳测试行为没有显著差异,并且随机繁殖的斯普拉格-道利大鼠在暴露于作为该测试基础的轻度应激源后,游泳测试活动没有减少。
这些结果表明,这里描述的程序,使用了对应激条件敏感的大鼠作为实验对象,可能是一种用于有效抗抑郁治疗的选择性筛选技术。