Schouten Jeroen A, Hulscher Marlies E, Kullberg Bart-Jan, Cox Anton, Gyssens Inge C, van der Meer Jos W, Grol Richard P
Centre for Quality of Care Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Sep;56(3):575-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki275. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
To develop effective and targeted interventions to improve care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), insight is needed into the factors that influence the quality of antibiotic use. Therefore, we measured the performance of nine quality indicators and studied determinants of variation in the quality of antibiotic use.
Data on 498 prospectively included patients with CAP from eight medium-sized Dutch hospitals were extracted from the medical charts. Outcomes of nine indicators were calculated using previously constructed algorithms. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to explain differences in performance rates at the patient, doctor and hospital level.
Performance indicators were generally moderate. Markers of severe illness were found to be positive predictors of timely administration of antibiotics (low oxygen saturation on admission OR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04--1.19) and obtaining blood samples for culture (low sodium concentration on admission OR 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03--1.16). Recent outpatient antibiotic therapy (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26--0.80) and presence of a hospital antibiotic committee (OR 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08--0.90) were negatively associated with guideline-adherent empirical therapy. The main positive predictor of timely administration of antibiotics (within 4 h) was antibiotic administration in the Emergency Department (ED) (OR 3.9; 95% CI: 1.96--8.73).
We gained new insights into factors that determine quality of antibiotic prescription in hospitals. Treatment in the ED, rather than in the ward, will result in earlier administration of antibiotics. Guidelines should clarify preferred antibiotic management of patients who have received antibiotics prior to admission. Hospital-based structures aimed at quality improvement, such as antibiotic committees, do not necessarily lead to better adherence to national standards. Efforts should be made to encourage these committees to implement national guidelines at a local level.
为制定有效且有针对性的干预措施以改善社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的护理,需要深入了解影响抗生素使用质量的因素。因此,我们衡量了九项质量指标的表现,并研究了抗生素使用质量差异的决定因素。
从八家荷兰中型医院前瞻性纳入的498例CAP患者的数据从病历中提取。使用先前构建的算法计算九项指标的结果。进行多水平逻辑回归分析以解释患者、医生和医院层面表现率的差异。
性能指标总体中等。发现严重疾病标志物是抗生素及时给药(入院时低氧饱和度,比值比[OR]1.11;95%置信区间[CI]:1.04 - 1.19)和采集血样进行培养(入院时低钠浓度,OR 1.10;95%CI:1.03 - 1.16)的阳性预测因素。近期门诊抗生素治疗(OR 0.46;95%CI:0.26 - 0.80)和医院抗生素委员会的存在(OR 0.27;95%CI:0.08 - 0.90)与遵循指南的经验性治疗呈负相关。抗生素及时给药(4小时内)的主要阳性预测因素是在急诊科(ED)给药(OR 3.9;95%CI:1.96 - 8.73)。
我们对决定医院抗生素处方质量的因素有了新的认识。在急诊科而非病房进行治疗将导致更早使用抗生素。指南应明确入院前接受过抗生素治疗患者的首选抗生素管理。旨在提高质量的医院结构,如抗生素委员会,不一定能更好地遵循国家标准。应努力鼓励这些委员会在地方层面实施国家指南。