Lindenauer Peter K, Pekow Penelope, Wang Kaijun, Mamidi Dheeresh K, Gutierrez Benjamin, Benjamin Evan M
Division of Healthcare Quality, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass 01199, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):349-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041895.
Despite limited evidence from randomized trials, perioperative treatment with beta-blockers is now widely advocated. We assessed the use of perioperative beta-blockers and their association with in-hospital mortality in routine clinical practice.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age or older who underwent major noncardiac surgery in 2000 and 2001 at 329 hospitals throughout the United States. We used propensity-score matching to adjust for differences between patients who received perioperative beta-blockers and those who did not receive such therapy and compared in-hospital mortality using multivariable logistic modeling.
Of 782,969 patients, 663,635 (85 percent) had no recorded contraindications to beta-blockers, 122,338 of whom (18 percent) received such treatment during the first two hospital days, including 14 percent of patients with a Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score of 0 and 44 percent with a score of 4 or higher. The relationship between perioperative beta-blocker treatment and the risk of death varied directly with cardiac risk; among the 580,665 patients with an RCRI score of 0 or 1, treatment was associated with no benefit and possible harm, whereas among the patients with an RCRI score of 2, 3, or 4 or more, the adjusted odds ratios for death in the hospital were 0.88 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.98), 0.71 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.80), and 0.58 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.67), respectively.
Perioperative beta-blocker therapy is associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital death among high-risk, but not low-risk, patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Patient safety may be enhanced by increasing the use of beta-blockers in high-risk patients.
尽管随机试验的证据有限,但目前围手术期使用β受体阻滞剂的治疗方法已得到广泛提倡。我们评估了围手术期β受体阻滞剂的使用情况及其与常规临床实践中院内死亡率的关联。
我们对2000年和2001年在美国329家医院接受非心脏大手术的18岁及以上患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用倾向评分匹配来调整接受围手术期β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者与未接受此类治疗的患者之间的差异,并使用多变量逻辑模型比较院内死亡率。
在782,969例患者中,663,635例(85%)没有记录到β受体阻滞剂的禁忌证,其中122,338例(18%)在入院后的头两天接受了此类治疗,包括修订心脏风险指数(RCRI)评分为0的患者中的14%以及评分为4或更高的患者中的'44%。围手术期β受体阻滞剂治疗与死亡风险之间的关系随心脏风险直接变化;在RCRI评分为0或1的580,665例患者中,治疗无益处且可能有害,而在RCRI评分为2、3或4及以上的患者中,院内死亡的调整优势比分别为0.88(95%置信区间,0.80至0.98)、0.71(95%置信区间,0.63至0.80)和0.58(95%置信区间,0.50至0.67)。
围手术期β受体阻滞剂治疗与接受非心脏大手术的高危患者而非低危患者的院内死亡风险降低相关。通过增加高危患者β受体阻滞剂的使用可能会提高患者安全性。