Suppr超能文献

一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究,旨在评估改良屋尘螨变应原提取物在过敏性哮喘中的疗效和安全性。

Double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess efficacy and safety of a modified allergen extract of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in allergic asthma.

作者信息

Ameal A, Vega-Chicote J M, Fernández S, Miranda A, Carmona M J, Rondón M C, Reina E, García-González J J

机构信息

Allergy Department, Hospital 'Carlos Haya', Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Allergy. 2005 Sep;60(9):1178-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00862.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients allergic asthma sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety after 1-year of immunotherapy with a modified D. pteronyssinus extract compared with placebo.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients were randomly allocated to receive the active treatment (n = 29), or placebo (n = 26). The main outcome was the specific bronchial provocation test (BPT). Other parameters analysed were dose-response skin prick test (SPT), symptom and medication scores and asthma quality of life (AQLQ).

RESULTS

At the end of the study, the active group showed a significant increase in the PD(20)FEV(1) compared with placebo (P = 0.0029). Nineteen patients of the active vs 10 of the placebo group needed more than twice the initial amount of allergen extract to have a positive BPT (P = 0.0293); seven patients in the placebo vs one in the active group needed less than half (P = 0.0137). In SPT, a significant improvement (P = 0.0049) was found in the active group. This group also had a median reduction of 91.5% in symptom scores, whereas the placebo group increased by 86%. Medication scores decreased in both groups (56% in the active and 11.4% in the placebo). In AQLQ, the differences between both groups were significant (P = 0.0234) at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

After 1 year of treatment, the modified extract of D. pteronyssinus demonstrated to be safe and efficacious to treat patients with asthma and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis sensitized to this mite.

摘要

背景

在对屋尘螨过敏的过敏性哮喘患者中进行了一项随机双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

目的

评估与安慰剂相比,使用改良屋尘螨提取物进行1年免疫治疗后的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

55例患者被随机分配接受活性治疗(n = 29)或安慰剂(n = 26)。主要结局是特异性支气管激发试验(BPT)。分析的其他参数包括剂量反应皮肤点刺试验(SPT)、症状和药物评分以及哮喘生活质量(AQLQ)。

结果

在研究结束时,活性组的PD(20)FEV(1)与安慰剂相比显著增加(P = 0.0029)。活性组19例患者与安慰剂组10例患者相比,需要超过初始变应原提取物量两倍才能使BPT呈阳性(P = 0.0293);安慰剂组7例患者与活性组1例患者相比,需要的量少于初始量的一半(P = 0.0137)。在SPT中,活性组有显著改善(P = 0.0049)。该组症状评分中位数降低了91.5%,而安慰剂组增加了86%。两组的药物评分均下降(活性组为56%,安慰剂组为11.4%)。在研究结束时,两组在AQLQ方面的差异具有显著性(P = 0.0234)。

结论

经过1年治疗,改良屋尘螨提取物被证明对治疗对该螨过敏的哮喘和过敏性鼻结膜炎患者是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验