Suppr超能文献

正中神经和尺神经损伤:现代显微外科神经修复术后运动和感觉恢复预测因素的荟萃分析

Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair.

作者信息

Ruijs Aleid C J, Jaquet Jean-Bart, Kalmijn Sandra, Giele Henk, Hovius Steven E R

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):484-94; discussion 495-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172896.86594.07.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to quantify variables that influence outcome after median and ulnar nerve transection injuries. The authors present a meta-analysis based on individual patient data on motor and sensory recovery after microsurgical nerve repair.

METHODS

From 130 studies found after literature review, 23 articles were ultimately included, giving individual data for 623 median or ulnar nerve injuries. The variables age, sex, nerve, site of injury, type of repair, use of grafts, delay between injury and repair, follow-up period, and outcome were extracted. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as British Medical Research Council motor scale grade 4 and 5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as British Medical Research Council grade 3+ and 4. For motor and sensory recovery, complete data were available for 281 and 380 nerve injuries, respectively.

RESULTS

Motor and sensory recovery were significantly associated (Spearman r = 0.62, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (< 16 years versus > 40 years: odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.2), site (proximal versus distal: odds ratio, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 1.10), and delay (per month: odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.98) were significant predictors of successful motor recovery. In ulnar nerve injuries, the chance of motor recovery was 71 percent lower than in median nerve injuries (odds ratio, 0.29; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.55). For sensory recovery, age (odds ratio, 27.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 9.4 to 77.6) and delay (per month: odds ratio, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.98) were found to be significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this individual patient data meta-analysis, age, site, injured nerve, and delay significantly influenced prognosis after microsurgical repair of median and ulnar nerve injuries.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在量化影响正中神经和尺神经横断伤预后的变量。作者基于个体患者数据,对显微外科神经修复术后的运动和感觉恢复情况进行了荟萃分析。

方法

在文献回顾后找到的130项研究中,最终纳入了23篇文章,提供了623例正中神经或尺神经损伤的个体数据。提取了年龄、性别、神经、损伤部位、修复类型、移植物使用情况、损伤与修复之间的间隔时间、随访期和预后等变量。满意的运动恢复定义为英国医学研究委员会运动量表4级和5级,满意的感觉恢复定义为英国医学研究委员会3+级和4级。对于运动和感觉恢复,分别有281例和380例神经损伤的完整数据。

结果

运动和感觉恢复显著相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数r = 0.62,p < 0.001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄(<16岁与>40岁:比值比,4.3;95%置信区间,1.6至11.2)、部位(近端与远端:比值比,0.46;95%置信区间,0.20至1.10)和间隔时间(每月:比值比,0.94;95%置信区间,0.90至0.98)是运动恢复成功的显著预测因素。在尺神经损伤中,运动恢复的机会比正中神经损伤低71%(比值比,0.29;95%置信区间,0.15至0.55)。对于感觉恢复,发现年龄(比值比,27.0;95%置信区间,9.4至77.6)和间隔时间(每月:比值比,0.92;95%置信区间,0.87至0.98)是显著预测因素。

结论

在这项个体患者数据荟萃分析中,年龄、部位、损伤神经和间隔时间显著影响正中神经和尺神经损伤显微外科修复后的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验