Yang Bao-zhong, Wu Qing-hua, Han Yan-min, Chen Zhong, Huo Xin
Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jul 15;43(14):926-8.
To summarize experiences of aortoiliac reconstruction through retroperitoneal approach.
Twenty-eight patients underwent retroperitoneal aortoiliac reconstructions, including aortic aneurysmectomy with graft replacement, aortic endarterectomy with patch angioplasty, thoraco-abdominal aortic bypass, resection of retroperitoneal mass with ilio-femoral bypass, iliac aneurysmectomy with aorto-external iliac artery bypass, removal of aortoiliac foreign body, common iliac endarterectomy, aorto (ilio)-femeral bypass and common ilio-femo-popliteal bypass. Drainage tubes were placed retroperitoneally in 24 cases.
All operations in this group were successful without perioperative death. The volume of intra-operative bleeding was 100-400 ml (mean 240 ml). Blood transfusion were employed in 2 cases. Retroperitoneal drainage was 50-170 ml (mean 85 ml). Naso-gastric tubes were removed 28 h on average after operation. All patients recovered uneventfully except that cardiac insufficiency, stress ulcer and retroperitoneal hematoma were present in 3 patients respectively. Twenty-two patients were followed up from 3 months to 2.5 years. One patient died of AMI 2 years after operation. One patient receiving ilio-femo-popliteal bypass was found to have occlusion of femo-popliteal segment of prosthetic graft. One patient developed brain hemorrhage 1.5 years postoperatively. All the other followed-up patients were living well.
Retroperitoneal approach, not violating the peritoneal cavity, offers certain physiological advantages associated with minimal disturbance of gastrointestinal and respiratory function, thereby decreasing respiratory complications and postoperative ileus, avoiding intra-abdominal adhesions with their attendant risk of early and late small bowel obstruction. It proved to be a simple and safe alternative for surgical treatment of aortoiliac diseases.
总结经腹膜后途径进行主髂动脉重建的经验。
28例患者接受了腹膜后主髂动脉重建术,包括主动脉瘤切除人工血管置换术、主动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术、胸腹主动脉旁路移植术、腹膜后肿物切除加髂股旁路移植术、髂动脉瘤切除加主动脉-髂外动脉旁路移植术、主髂动脉异物取出术、髂总动脉内膜切除术、主动脉(髂动脉)-股动脉旁路移植术以及髂总-股-腘动脉旁路移植术。24例患者在腹膜后置入引流管。
该组所有手术均成功,无围手术期死亡。术中出血量为100~400毫升(平均240毫升)。2例患者输血。腹膜后引流量为50~170毫升(平均85毫升)。术后平均28小时拔除胃管。所有患者均顺利康复,仅3例患者分别出现心功能不全、应激性溃疡和腹膜后血肿。22例患者接受了3个月至2.5年的随访。1例患者术后2年死于急性心肌梗死。1例接受髂-股-腘动脉旁路移植术的患者,其人工血管股-腘段发生闭塞。1例患者术后1.5年发生脑出血。其他所有接受随访的患者情况良好。
腹膜后途径不进入腹腔,具有一定的生理优势,对胃肠和呼吸功能干扰极小,从而减少呼吸并发症和术后肠梗阻,避免腹腔内粘连及其伴随的早期和晚期小肠梗阻风险。事实证明,它是主髂动脉疾病手术治疗的一种简单且安全的选择。