• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂与GnRH激动剂激发方案在卵巢刺激反应不良患者中的比较。

Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation.

作者信息

Malmusi Stefania, La Marca Antonio, Giulini Simone, Xella Susanna, Tagliasacchi Daniela, Marsella Tiziana, Volpe Annibale

机构信息

Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico of Modena, Modena University, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.139.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.139
PMID:16084881
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of flare-up and GnRH-antagonist treatment in poor-responder patients.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S): Fifty-five poor-responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S): Thirty patients received GnRH agonist on the 1st day of menstruation, followed by exogenous gonadotropins from the 2nd day. Twenty-five patients received exogenous gonadotropins starting on the second day of menstruation, followed by GnRH antagonist when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The total dose of FSH administered during the ovarian stimulation, as well as the number of mature oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates were evaluated.

RESULT(S): The number of ampules and units of FSH administered were significantly less in the flare-up than in the antagonistic group. The numbers of mature oocytes retrieved and of top-quality embryos transferred were significantly greater in the flare-up than in the GnRH-antagonist group. The fertilization rate (84% vs. 63%) was significantly higher in the flare-up than in the GnRH-antagonist group. The implantation and pregnancy rate were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S): The flare-up protocol appears to be more effective than the GnRH-antagonist protocol in terms of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and top-quality embryos transferred in poor-responder patients.

摘要

目的

比较激动剂方案和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案对卵巢低反应患者的疗效。

设计

随机前瞻性研究。

地点

辅助生殖中心。

患者

55例接受卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的卵巢低反应患者。

干预措施

30例患者在月经第1天接受GnRH激动剂治疗,从第2天开始使用外源性促性腺激素。25例患者从月经第2天开始使用外源性促性腺激素,当主导卵泡直径达到14 mm时开始使用GnRH拮抗剂。

主要观察指标

评估卵巢刺激期间促卵泡激素(FSH)的总给药剂量,以及获取的成熟卵母细胞数量、胚胎质量、受精率、着床率和妊娠率。

结果

激动剂方案组FSH的安瓿数和单位数显著少于拮抗剂方案组。激动剂方案组获取的成熟卵母细胞数量和移植的优质胚胎数量显著多于GnRH拮抗剂方案组。激动剂方案组的受精率(84%对63%)显著高于GnRH拮抗剂方案组。两组的着床率和妊娠率相似。

结论

在卵巢低反应患者中,就获取的成熟卵母细胞数量、受精率和移植的优质胚胎数量而言,激动剂方案似乎比GnRH拮抗剂方案更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂与GnRH激动剂激发方案在卵巢刺激反应不良患者中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.139.
2
Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle.微剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂激发方案与多剂量促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案用于接受卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植周期的低反应者的比较
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
3
Supplementation with a recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin microdose leads to similar outcomes in ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone using either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist for pituitary suppression.补充重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素微剂量可导致使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂或拮抗剂抑制垂体的情况下,使用重组卵泡刺激素进行卵巢刺激产生相似的结果。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.075. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
4
A comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare protocols for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂与 GnRH 激动剂flare 方案在体外受精中用于卵巢低反应患者的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):360-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
5
A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.一项关于在启动促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂后增加重组促卵泡激素用于体外受精-胚胎移植的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.040. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
6
Comparison of microdose flare-up and antagonist multiple-dose protocols for poor-responder patients: a randomized study.微剂量激发和拮抗剂多剂量方案用于反应不良患者的比较:一项随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Aug;92(2):481-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
7
Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes.对于既往体外受精结局不佳的患者,在促性腺激素刺激前,黄体期雌二醇贴片与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂抑制方案对比微剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案的研究
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.024. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
8
Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?低反应者的管理:一种新型促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂/来曲唑方案能否改善结局?
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.013. Epub 2007 May 4.
9
Evaluating the role of exogenous luteinizing hormone in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists.评估外源性促黄体生成素在接受促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂体外受精的低反应者中的作用。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.028.
10
A novel protocol of ovulation induction with delayed gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration combined with high-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for poor responders and women over 35 years.一种新型的促排卵方案,即延迟给予促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂,联合大剂量重组促卵泡生成素和枸橼酸氯米芬,用于卵巢低反应者和35岁以上女性。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.辅助生殖的控制性卵巢刺激方案:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
2
Flexible Antagonist versus Agonist Flare Protocol in Women above 40 Undergoing IVF, A retrospective Cohort Study.40 岁以上行 IVF 妇女中应用拮抗剂与激动剂灵活flare 方案:一项回顾性队列研究。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Sep 12;27(3):381-385. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220064.
3
Comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols among women with poor response: A randomized clinical trial.
反应不良女性中两种卵巢刺激方案的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2022 Jul 6;32(3):10634. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10634.
4
Response from the Authors Re: Letter to the Editor for Our Manuscript "Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles".
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Oct;38(10):2805. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02332-9. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
PPOS Protocol Effectively Improves the IVF Outcome Without Increasing the Recurrence Rate in Early Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients After Fertility Preserving Treatment.PPOS方案有效改善早期子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌和非典型子宫内膜增生患者保留生育功能治疗后的体外受精结局,且不增加复发率。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 27;8:581927. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.581927. eCollection 2021.
6
Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂在卵巢低反应患者方案中的荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;304(2):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05954-z. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
7
Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.界定接受辅助生殖技术的低预后患者:POSEIDON标准——原因
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 17;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
8
A comparative study on the results of agonist and antagonist protocols based on serum AMH levels in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.基于血清抗缪勒管激素水平的激动剂方案与拮抗剂方案在接受卵胞浆内单精子注射患者中的结果比较研究。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016 Dec;14(12):769-776.
9
Microdose Flare-up Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.微剂量激发促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂与GnRH拮抗剂方案用于接受卵胞浆内单精子注射的卵巢低反应者的比较
J Reprod Infertil. 2016 Jul-Sep;17(3):163-8.
10
Effective treatment protocol for poor ovarian response: A systematic review and meta-analysis.卵巢低反应的有效治疗方案:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):70-81. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.183515.