Suppr超能文献

非处方尼古丁替代疗法与戒烟

Over-the-counter availability of nicotine replacement therapy and smoking cessation.

作者信息

Hyland Andrew, Rezaishiraz Hamed, Giovino Gary, Bauer Joseph E, Michael Cummings K

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Aug;7(4):547-55. doi: 10.1080/14622200500185975.

Abstract

In 1996, the FDA approved over-the-counter (OTC) availability of nicotine gum and two brands of nicotine skin patches. Little is known about how this reclassification has influenced the effectiveness and use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and whether it has been a public health benefit. Data for the present study came from a prospective cohort study of 1,639 adult smokers surveyed by telephone in 1993, as part of the National Cancer Institute's Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), and resurveyed in 2001. NRT-assisted quit rates, NRT use rates, and the characteristics of NRT users were calculated before and after the 1996 OTC reclassification. Also calculated was the percentage of NRT users who quit by year. Results are presented for patch and gum separately and combined. OTC NRT use rates were lower for Hispanics and higher for those with no desire to quit at baseline. The quit rate decreased for patch-assisted quit attempts after OTC reclassification (22.5% to 18.5%, p = .05), but it did not change for gum-assisted quit attempts (11.9% to 10.5%, p = .54). NRT use rates increased for both patch and gum by about 60% following reclassification. A greater percentage of gum users had quit in the post-OTC period than in the pre-OTC period (9.7% vs. 14.6%, p = .05). Long-term quit rates in patch users were similar in both periods. Insurance coverage of NRT and concurrent attendance in a stop smoking clinic decreased for both patch- and gum-assisted attempts in the post-OTC period. The results suggest that OTC reclassification may have contributed to the increased use of NRT, compared with the pre-OTC period, whereas the efficacy for quitting decreased slightly for those using nicotine patch and remained about the same for those using the gum.

摘要

1996年,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准尼古丁口香糖和两种品牌的尼古丁皮肤贴片可非处方(OTC)购买。对于这种重新分类如何影响尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的有效性和使用,以及它是否带来了公共健康益处,人们知之甚少。本研究的数据来自一项前瞻性队列研究,该研究于1993年通过电话对1639名成年吸烟者进行了调查,作为美国国立癌症研究所戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT)的一部分,并于2001年进行了重新调查。计算了1996年非处方重新分类前后NRT辅助戒烟率、NRT使用率以及NRT使用者的特征。还计算了每年通过NRT戒烟的使用者的百分比。结果分别针对贴片和口香糖进行了呈现,并进行了合并。西班牙裔的非处方NRT使用率较低,而基线时无戒烟意愿者的使用率较高。非处方重新分类后,贴片辅助戒烟尝试的成功率下降(从22.5%降至18.5%,p = 0.05),但口香糖辅助戒烟尝试的成功率没有变化(从11.9%降至10.5%,p = 0.54)。重新分类后,贴片和口香糖的NRT使用率均增加了约60%。非处方期后,使用口香糖的使用者戒烟的百分比高于非处方期前(9.7%对14.6%,p = 0.05)。两个时期贴片使用者的长期戒烟率相似。非处方期后,贴片和口香糖辅助戒烟尝试中NRT的保险覆盖范围以及同时参加戒烟诊所的情况均有所下降。结果表明,与非处方期之前相比,非处方重新分类可能促使了NRT使用的增加,而使用尼古丁贴片的人戒烟效果略有下降,使用口香糖的人戒烟效果则基本保持不变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验