Suppr超能文献

一项随机试验,比较氯吡格雷与噻氯匹定疗法在接受梗死动脉支架置入术治疗急性心肌梗死并使用阿昔单抗作为辅助治疗的患者中的疗效。

A randomized trial comparing clopidogrel versus ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction with abciximab as adjunctive therapy.

作者信息

Parodi Guido, Sciagrà Roberto, Migliorini Angela, Memisha Gentian, Moschi Guia, Valenti Renato, Pupi Alberto, Antoniucci David

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2005 Aug;150(2):220. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.010.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the impact of a clopidogrel therapy on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing routine infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation and receiving routine abciximab therapy.

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory processes after mechanical restoration of flow in AMI play a central role in decreasing the effectiveness of reperfusion at microcirculatory level. Several studies suggest that clopidogrel may exert a protective effect against adverse cardiovascular events by virtue of its anti-inflammatory properties.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients with a first ST-elevation AMI were randomized to clopidogrel (600-mg loading dose before IRA stenting followed by 75 mg daily, n = 66) or ticlopidine (500 mg before IRA stenting followed by 250 mg twice daily, n = 67). The primary end point was scintigraphic infarct size at 1 month. The secondary end points were ST-segment elevation resolution within 3 hours of procedure and 1-month clinical outcome, as a composite of death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke within 1 month of the index procedure.

RESULTS

The 1-month technetium 99m sestamibi scintigraphy revealed similar infarct size (16.2% +/- 14.6% vs 15.0% +/- 14.1%, P = .703) and severity (0.48 +/- 0.18 vs 0.49 +/- 0.15, P = .592) in the clopidogrel group as compared with the ticlopidine group. Three-hour ST-segment resolution rate was similar in the 2 study groups (86% vs 89%, P = .642). At 1 month, there was no difference in major cardiovascular adverse event rate (3% vs 3%, P = .988). Discontinuation of thienopiridine therapy within the first month occurred in no patient randomized to clopidogrel and in 3 (4.5%) patients randomized to ticlopidine (P = .082).

CONCLUSION

Clopidogrel has no impact on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with AMI treated routinely with stenting and abciximab. However, clopidogrel, administered as a 600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily, is safe and at least as effective as the standard ticlopidine therapy in this subgroup of patients.

摘要

目的

评估氯吡格雷治疗对接受常规梗死相关动脉(IRA)支架植入并接受常规阿昔单抗治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者心肌再灌注有效性的影响。

背景

AMI血流机械恢复后的炎症过程在降低微循环水平再灌注有效性方面起核心作用。多项研究表明,氯吡格雷凭借其抗炎特性可能对不良心血管事件发挥保护作用。

方法

总共133例首次发生ST段抬高型AMI的患者被随机分为氯吡格雷组(IRA支架植入前给予600mg负荷剂量,随后每日75mg,n = 66)或噻氯匹定组(IRA支架植入前给予500mg,随后每日两次,每次250mg,n = 67)。主要终点为1个月时的心肌梗死核素显像梗死面积。次要终点为手术3小时内ST段抬高的缓解情况以及1个月时的临床结局,后者为指数手术1个月内死亡、再梗死、靶血管血运重建和卒中的综合情况。

结果

1个月时的锝99m甲氧基异丁基异腈心肌显像显示,氯吡格雷组与噻氯匹定组的梗死面积(分别为16.2%±14.6%和15.0%±14.1%,P = 0.703)和严重程度(分别为0.48±0.18和0.49±0.15,P = 0.592)相似。两个研究组的3小时ST段缓解率相似(分别为86%和89%,P = 0.642)。1个月时,主要心血管不良事件发生率无差异(分别为3%和3%,P = 0.988)。随机分组至氯吡格雷组的患者在第1个月内均未停用噻吩吡啶类药物,而随机分组至噻氯匹定组的3例(4.5%)患者在第1个月内停用了该药物(P = 0.082)。

结论

氯吡格雷对接受支架植入和阿昔单抗常规治疗的AMI患者的心肌再灌注有效性无影响。然而,以600mg负荷剂量随后每日75mg给药的氯吡格雷在此亚组患者中是安全的,且至少与标准噻氯匹定治疗同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验