Kelly B T, Turner A S, Bansal M, Terry M, Wolf B R, Warren R F, Altchek D W, Allen A A
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:95-101.
Traditionally, arthroscopic management of shoulder instability has been reserved for patients with isolated Bankart lesions without any capsular laxity or injury. To date, there are no animal studies evaluating the healing potential of capsular plication and/or capsulo-labral repair. The purpose of this in vivo animal study was to determine if the histological capsular healing of an open capsular plication simulating an arthroscopic plication is equivalent to the more traditional open capsular shift involving cutting and advancing the capsule. Twenty-six skeletally mature sheep were randomized to either an open capsular plication simulating arthroscopic plication (n = 13), or an open traditional capsular shift (n = 13). A sham operation (n = 4) was also performed involving exposure to visualize the capsule. Normal non-operated control shoulders were also analyzed. A pathologist blinded to the treatment evaluated both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections and polarized light microscopy. Qualitative scoring evaluated fibrosis, mucinous degeneration, fat necrosis, granuloma formation, vascularity, inflammatory infiltrate and hemosiderin (0 to 3 points). Both the capsular plication and open shift groups demonstrated healing by fibrosis at the site of surgical manipulation. There were no statistical differences in the capsular healing responses between the two groups with regard to fibrosis, granuloma formation and vascularity. The open shift group demonstrated significantly more mucinous degeneration (p = 0.038). Fat necrosis was present in 4/13 specimens in the open shift group and none in the capsular plication specimens. Both groups demonstrated disorganized collagen formation under polarized light microscopy. There were no differences between non-operated control specimens and sham surgery specimens. Our findings support the hypothesis that histologic capsular healing is equivalent between the plication group and the open shift group. In addition, the open shift group demonstrated significantly more changes indicative of tissue injury. This basic science model confirms capsular healing after simulated arthroscopic plication, providing support for arthroscopic capsular plication in practice.
传统上,肩关节不稳的关节镜治疗一直局限于孤立性Bankart损伤且无任何关节囊松弛或损伤的患者。迄今为止,尚无动物研究评估关节囊折叠和/或关节囊 - 盂唇修复的愈合潜力。本体内动物研究的目的是确定模拟关节镜折叠的开放性关节囊折叠的组织学关节囊愈合是否等同于更传统的开放性关节囊移位,后者涉及切开并推进关节囊。26只骨骼成熟的绵羊被随机分为模拟关节镜折叠的开放性关节囊折叠组(n = 13)或开放性传统关节囊移位组(n = 13)。还进行了假手术(n = 4),包括暴露以观察关节囊。同时分析正常未手术的对照肩关节。由对治疗不知情的病理学家评估苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片以及偏振光显微镜检查。定性评分评估纤维化、黏液样变性、脂肪坏死、肉芽肿形成、血管形成、炎性浸润和含铁血黄素(0至3分)。关节囊折叠组和开放性移位组在手术操作部位均通过纤维化实现愈合。两组在纤维化、肉芽肿形成和血管形成方面的关节囊愈合反应无统计学差异。开放性移位组黏液样变性明显更多(p = 0.038)。开放性移位组13个标本中有4个出现脂肪坏死,关节囊折叠标本中无脂肪坏死。两组在偏振光显微镜下均显示胶原形成紊乱。未手术对照标本和假手术标本之间无差异。我们的研究结果支持以下假设:折叠组和开放性移位组之间的组织学关节囊愈合相当。此外,开放性移位组显示出更多表明组织损伤的变化。这个基础科学模型证实了模拟关节镜折叠后的关节囊愈合,为实践中的关节镜下关节囊折叠提供了支持。