Reginster Jean-Yves, Abadie Eric, Delmas Pierre, Rizzoli René, Dere Willard, der Auwera Philippevan, Avouac Bernard, Brandi Maria-Luisa, Daifotis Anastasia, Diez-Perez Adolfo, Calvo Gonzalo, Johnell Olof, Kaufman Jean-Marc, Kreutz Gottfried, Laslop Andrea, Lekkerkerker Fritz, Mitlak Bruce, Nilsson Per, Orloff John, Smillie Mary, Taylor Andrew, Tsouderos Yannis, Ethgen Dominique, Flamion Bruno
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan;17(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1984-3. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
Recent advances in the understanding of the epidemiology of osteoporosis suggest that certain parts of the current European guidelines for the registration of drugs in osteoporosis might be no longer substantiated. The object of this review is to provide the European regulatory authorities with an evidence-based working document providing suggestions for the revision of the "Note for guidance for the approval of drugs to be used in postmenopausal osteoporosis" (CPMP/EWP/552/95). Following an extensive review of the literature (1990-2004), the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) organized a workshop including European regulators, academic scientists and representatives of the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes of this meeting reflect the personal views of those who attended and should not, in any case, be seen as an official position paper of any regulatory agency. The group identified a certain number of points that deserve discussion. They mainly relate to the nature of the indication being granted to new chemical entities (treatment of osteoporosis in women at high risk of fracture instead of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis), the requirements of showing an anti-fracture efficacy on all or on major nonvertebral fractures (instead of the hip), the duration of pivotal trials (2 years instead of 3) and the possibility of considering bridging studies for new routes of administration, new doses or new regimens of previously approved drugs. The group also recommends that an indication could be granted for the treatment of osteoporosis in males on the basis of a placebo-controlled study, with bone mineral density changes after 1 year as the primary endpoint, for medications approved in the treatment of osteoporosis in women at high risk of fractures.
对骨质疏松症流行病学认识的最新进展表明,当前欧洲骨质疏松症药物注册指南的某些部分可能不再有充分依据。本综述的目的是为欧洲监管机构提供一份基于证据的工作文件,就修订《绝经后骨质疏松症治疗药物批准指南》(CPMP/EWP/552/95)提出建议。在广泛回顾文献(1990 - 2004年)之后,科学伦理与卓越尊重小组(GREES)组织了一次研讨会,参会人员包括欧洲监管机构人员、学术科学家和制药行业代表。本次会议的成果反映了参会人员的个人观点,无论如何都不应被视为任何监管机构的官方立场文件。该小组确定了一些值得讨论的要点。它们主要涉及给予新化学实体的适应症性质(治疗骨折高风险女性的骨质疏松症而非预防和治疗骨质疏松症)、证明对所有或主要非椎体骨折(而非髋部骨折)具有抗骨折疗效的要求、关键试验的持续时间(2年而非3年)以及考虑对先前批准药物的新给药途径、新剂量或新方案进行桥接研究的可能性。该小组还建议,对于已批准用于治疗骨折高风险女性骨质疏松症的药物,可基于一项安慰剂对照研究给予男性骨质疏松症治疗的适应症,将1年后的骨密度变化作为主要终点。