Suppr超能文献

滑车神经麻痹患者中危害正切屏与搜索线圈记录的比较。

Comparison of Harms tangent screen and search coil recordings in patients with trochlear nerve palsy.

作者信息

Pfenninger Lukas, Landau Klara, Bergamin Oliver

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 24, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2006 Apr;46(8-9):1404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.026. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

Abstract

Harms tangent screen, a subjective measurement method of three-dimensional binocular alignment, was compared with search coil recording. Twenty-three patients with unilateral trochlear nerve palsy were measured in nine gaze positions. The two methods correlated best for the horizontal gaze deviation, the vertical gaze deviation, and the vertical incomitance, but there was no correlation for the results of torsional incomitance. Using Harms tangent screen, torsional deviation underestimated the torsional incomitance measured by the search coils. Therefore, central torsional fusional mechanisms or alignment error in the Harms tangent screen are assumed.

摘要

哈姆斯正切屏,一种三维双眼视轴矫正的主观测量方法,与搜索线圈记录法进行了比较。对23名单侧滑车神经麻痹患者在9个注视位进行了测量。两种方法在水平注视偏差、垂直注视偏差和垂直非共同性方面相关性最佳,但在扭转非共同性结果方面无相关性。使用哈姆斯正切屏时,扭转偏差低估了搜索线圈测量的扭转非共同性。因此,推测存在中枢扭转融合机制或哈姆斯正切屏中的视轴矫正误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验