Nurko Carlos, Proffit William R
Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jul;75(4):521-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[521:AAPEOW]2.0.CO;2.
For a predoctoral course in advanced clinical orthodontics, we evaluated the acceptability to students (how well did you like it?) and the perceived effectiveness (how well did it help you learn?) of Web-based self-instruction plus small-group seminars. On a 10-point Likert scale, median scores for acceptability and effectiveness of the self-instructional modules and seminars were nine. More than half the students rated the modules as excellent, and two-thirds rated the seminars as excellent. No students rated either the modules or the seminars as poor. With the use of structured seminar outlines, there were no significant differences in seminar scores among the seminar leaders. Compared with their predecessors who had a traditional lecture course, students who had the new self-instructional course were less likely to report either the positive or negative extremes in confidence about their ability to recognize treatment alternatives for orthodontic problems. The results indicate that Web-based self-instruction plus small-group seminars coordinated by a course leader is at least as effective as traditional lectures. This approach offers a possible way to share faculty among orthodontic departments for both pre- and postdoctoral education, as a way to help overcome faculty shortages.
对于一门博士前高级临床正畸学课程,我们评估了学生对基于网络的自学加小组研讨课的接受度(你有多喜欢它?)和感知有效性(它对你的学习有多大帮助?)。在10分制的李克特量表上,自学模块和研讨课的接受度和有效性的中位数得分均为9分。超过一半的学生将模块评为优秀,三分之二的学生将研讨课评为优秀。没有学生将模块或研讨课评为差。使用结构化的研讨课大纲后,研讨课领导者之间的研讨课得分没有显著差异。与参加传统讲座课程的前辈相比,参加新自学课程的学生在识别正畸问题治疗方案能力方面,不太可能报告信心的正负极端情况。结果表明,由课程负责人协调的基于网络的自学加小组研讨课至少与传统讲座一样有效。这种方法提供了一种在正畸科之间共享师资用于博士前和博士后教育的可能途径,作为帮助克服师资短缺的一种方式。