Sayin M Ozgür, Türkkahraman Hakan
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jul;75(4):656-60. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[656:CEONFW]2.0.CO;2.
Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 nongrowing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.
评估安氏II类患者上颌和下颌骨骼及牙齿位置以及垂直方向组成部分的研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。此外,关于颅底形态尚未发现一致的结果。然而,很少有研究对成年患者进行评估。本研究的目的是确定患有骨骼及牙齿安氏II类1分类错牙合的患者是否具有特定的颅面特征。为此,对40名成年女性进行了头影测量评估。安氏II类1分类患者几乎所有测量值均观察到广泛差异。然而,下颌后位且旋转、下颌切牙前突以及颅底角增大均是安氏II类1分类患者的平均特征。