Walker Suzanne E
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri 65804, USA.
Am J Primatol. 2005 Aug;66(4):369-87. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20162.
I observed leaping behavior in the white-faced saki (Pithecia pithecia) and the black-bearded saki (Chiropotes satanas satanas) for 15 and 10 months, respectively, as part of a larger study of positional behavior in the tribe Pitheciini. I used focal animal instantaneous sampling to observe the two species on separate islands in their natural habitat at Guri Lake, Venezuela. Leaping behavior correlates with patterns of forest use and body size, and differences between the species relate more to habitat preferences than to habitat differences per se. Pithecia usually chose vertical or highly angled supports of lower tree portions for take-off and landing, and took off from a stationary posture. Chiropotes took off from the main crown or terminal branches, gaining momentum from locomotor movement before performing a leaping take-off. Pithecia's vertical body orientation and longer leap distance allowed it to assume a mid-flight tuck to prepare for a hindlimb-first landing onto a solid support, and to absorb landing forces with its relatively longer hindlimbs. Chiropotes remained more pronograde throughout its leaps, and minimized landing forces by landing on all four limbs onto numerous flexible supports in the terminal branches. The smaller-bodied P. pithecia is specialized for vertical clinging and leaping, and exhibits behavioral and morphological parallels with other vertical clingers and leapers. The larger C. satanas is a generalized leaper that lacks morphological specializations for leaping. Pithecia's use of solid supports in the lower tree portions allows it to move quietly through the forest-one of a suite of behaviors related to predator avoidance. This example of variation within one behavioral category has implications for devising locomotor classifications and interpreting fossil remains.
作为对狨猴族位置行为的一项更大规模研究的一部分,我分别对白面僧面猴(Pithecia pithecia)和黑须僧面猴(Chiropotes satanas satanas)的跳跃行为进行了15个月和10个月的观察。我采用焦点动物瞬间取样法,在委内瑞拉古里湖它们自然栖息地的不同岛屿上观察这两个物种。跳跃行为与森林利用模式和体型大小相关,物种之间的差异更多地与栖息地偏好有关,而非栖息地本身的差异。僧面猴通常选择较低树段的垂直或高角度支撑物进行起跳和着陆,并从静止姿势起跳。须僧面猴从树冠或顶部分支起跳,在进行跳跃式起飞前通过运动获得动量。僧面猴垂直的身体方向和更长的跳跃距离使其能够在飞行中蜷缩身体,为后肢先着地落到坚实支撑物上做准备,并利用其相对较长的后肢吸收着陆力。须僧面猴在整个跳跃过程中保持更俯卧的姿势,并通过四肢着地落在顶部分支的众多柔性支撑物上来最小化着陆力。体型较小的僧面猴专门适应垂直攀爬和跳跃,并且在行为和形态上与其他垂直攀爬和跳跃者有相似之处。体型较大的须僧面猴是一种普通的跳跃者,缺乏专门的跳跃形态特征。僧面猴在较低树段使用坚实支撑物使其能够在森林中安静地移动——这是一系列与躲避捕食者相关的行为之一。这个在一个行为类别内变化的例子对设计运动分类和解释化石遗迹有启示意义。