Takahashi M, Sugiuchi Y, Izawa Y, Shinoda Y
Department of Systems Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1707-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00347.2005.
Previous electrophysiological studies have shown that the commissural connections between the two superior colliculi are mainly inhibitory with fewer excitatory connections. However, the functional roles of the commissural connections are not well understood, so we sought to clarify the physiology of tectal commissural excitation and inhibition of tectoreticular neurons (TRNs) in the "fixation " and "saccade " zones of the superior colliculus (SC). By recording intracellular potentials, we identified TRNs by their antidromic responses to stimulation of the omnipause neuron (OPN) and inhibitory burst neuron (IBN) regions and analyzed the effects of stimulation of the contralateral SC on these TRNs in anesthetized cats. TRNs in the caudal SC (saccade neurons) projected to the IBN region, and received mono- or disynaptic inhibition from the entire rostrocaudal extent of the contralateral SC. In contrast, TRNs in the rostral SC projected to the OPN or IBN region and received monosynaptic excitation from the most rostral level of the contralateral SC, and mono- or disynaptic inhibition from its entire rostrocaudal extent. Among the rostral TRNs with commissural excitation, IBN-projecting TRNs also projected to Forel's field H (vertical gaze center), suggesting that they were most likely saccade neurons related to vertical saccades. In contrast, TRNs projecting only to the OPN region were most likely fixation neurons. Most putative inhibitory neurons in the rostral SC had multiple axon branches throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the contralateral SC, whereas excitatory commissural neurons, most of which were rostral TRNs, distributed terminals to a discrete region in the rostral SC.
以往的电生理研究表明,两个上丘之间的连合连接主要是抑制性的,兴奋性连接较少。然而,连合连接的功能作用尚未得到很好的理解,因此我们试图阐明上丘(SC)“注视”和“扫视”区域中顶盖连合对顶盖网状神经元(TRN)的兴奋和抑制的生理学机制。通过记录细胞内电位,我们根据对全暂停神经元(OPN)和抑制性爆发神经元(IBN)区域刺激的逆向反应来识别TRN,并分析了在麻醉猫中刺激对侧SC对这些TRN的影响。尾侧SC中的TRN(扫视神经元)投射到IBN区域,并从对侧SC的整个头尾范围内接受单突触或双突触抑制。相比之下,头侧SC中的TRN投射到OPN或IBN区域,并从对侧SC的最头侧水平接受单突触兴奋,并从其整个头尾范围内接受单突触或双突触抑制。在具有连合兴奋的头侧TRN中,投射到IBN的TRN也投射到Forel氏场H(垂直注视中枢),这表明它们很可能是与垂直扫视相关的扫视神经元。相比之下,仅投射到OPN区域的TRN很可能是注视神经元。头侧SC中大多数假定的抑制性神经元在对侧SC的整个头尾范围内有多个轴突分支,而兴奋性连合神经元,其中大多数是头侧TRN,其终末分布在头侧SC的一个离散区域。