Vlajcic Zlatko, Zic Rado, Stanec Sanda, Lambasa Smiljka, Petrovecki Mladen, Stanec Zdenko
Department of Plastic Surgery, Biochemical Laboratory, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Suska 6, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):240-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85.
Recently, skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation has been promoted as an oncologically safe procedure in practice for selected patients. The criteria of selection have not been yet defined precisely. The focus of this study was to investigate predictive factors of NAC-base neoplastic involvement to define the indications for NAC preservation. A prospective clinical study was conducted of 108 randomly selected female patients with invasive breast cancer. Analyzed markers of NAC involvement were tumor-nipple distance (TND), tumor size, localization, histologic type, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), site, and axillary lymph-node status. The definitive histologic findings of the NAC base were compared with analyzed markers and the frozen section results. NAC base was positive in 23.15% patients at definitive histology with false-negative results in 4.63% patients at intraoperative frozen section. Significant differences were found in TND, tumor size, axillary lymph-node status, and LVI. There were no significant differences in tumor grade and site and not enough cases for statistical evaluation in histologic type and localization. Clinical indications for NAC preservation, according to this study, include tumors < or =2.5 cm, TND >4 cm, negative axillary lymph node status, and no LVI. Considering the possibility of pre- or intraoperative measurement, tumor size, and TND evaluation will result in the lowest possible mistakes in NAC preservation. Frozen section analyses of the NAC base, because of the "false-negative" possibility, could be deemed as a relative prognostic factor until definitive histologic findings. The presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) in the "borderline" cases of these criteria could be an additional argument for NAC removal.
近来,保留乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的保乳皮肤切除术(SSM)在特定患者的实际应用中已被推广为一种肿瘤学上安全的手术方式。然而,其选择标准尚未精确界定。本研究的重点是调查NAC基底肿瘤累及的预测因素,以明确保留NAC的指征。对108例随机选取的浸润性乳腺癌女性患者进行了一项前瞻性临床研究。分析的NAC累及标志物包括肿瘤-乳头距离(TND)、肿瘤大小、位置、组织学类型、分级、淋巴管浸润(LVI)、部位以及腋窝淋巴结状态。将NAC基底的最终组织学结果与分析的标志物及术中冰冻切片结果进行比较。在最终组织学检查中,23.15%的患者NAC基底呈阳性,术中冰冻切片检查有4.63%的患者出现假阴性结果。在TND、肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结状态和LVI方面发现了显著差异。肿瘤分级和部位无显著差异,组织学类型和位置方面因病例数不足无法进行统计学评估。根据本研究,保留NAC的临床指征包括肿瘤≤2.5 cm、TND>4 cm、腋窝淋巴结阴性以及无LVI。考虑到术前或术中测量的可能性,肿瘤大小和TND评估将使NAC保留中的错误尽可能降至最低。由于存在“假阴性”的可能性,在获得最终组织学结果之前,NAC基底的冰冻切片分析可被视为一个相对的预后因素。在这些标准的“临界”病例中,广泛导管内成分(EIC)的存在可能是切除NAC的另一个理由。