Moriya K, Uchiyama T, Kawaji Y
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tachikawa General Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan.
Hand Surg. 2005 Jul;10(1):83-6. doi: 10.1142/S0218810405002619.
We reviewed 110 trigger digits, treated surgically, to compare the outcomes of trigger finger and trigger thumb in terms of peri-operative characteristics and complications. The patients with trigger thumb complained mainly of pain on motion, while those with trigger finger complained of triggering or limited range of motion. Trigger fingers had a significantly longer duration before surgery than did trigger thumbs. Trigger fingers took significantly longer for the symptoms to subside. In our series, 64% of trigger fingers had a flexion contracture of the PIP joint more than three weeks after surgery. Our results suggest that the peri-operative characteristics and outcomes differ between trigger finger and thumb, and that the surgical outcome for trigger finger was poorer than that for trigger thumb, partly due to flexion contracture of the PIP joint.
我们回顾了110例接受手术治疗的扳机指病例,以比较扳机指和扳机拇在围手术期特征及并发症方面的治疗结果。扳机拇患者主要抱怨活动时疼痛,而扳机指患者则抱怨弹响或活动范围受限。扳机指术前病程明显长于扳机拇。扳机指症状消退所需时间明显更长。在我们的病例系列中,64%的扳机指在术后三周以上出现近端指间关节屈曲挛缩。我们的结果表明,扳机指和扳机拇的围手术期特征及结果有所不同,且扳机指的手术效果比扳机拇差,部分原因是近端指间关节屈曲挛缩。